Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - davidgzach

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 85
16
Equipment and Software / Re: New MT ordered
« on: May 21, 2013, 05:28:02 AM »
Was just perusing the rest of this topic and found this below.  Maybe this will cement your decision to go with an IC......

http://www.homebrewersassociation.org/forum/index.php?topic=15661.0

Dave

17
Equipment and Software / Re: New MT ordered
« on: May 21, 2013, 05:05:40 AM »
I love my IC.  Gets me to pitching temps in 15-20 minutes depending upon the season.  I've recommended these guys to a few buddies now.  They always seem to be the cheapest and I've had zero problems with mine.  Not sure of your set-up but the garden hose fittings are key for me.

http://www.nybrewsupply.com/beer-home-brewing-equipment/wort-chillers/copper-wort-chiller-garden-hose-fittings-12-x-50.html

Dave

18
Equipment and Software / Re: Those little red cans of Oxygen
« on: May 21, 2013, 04:58:58 AM »

Or just stay away from oxygen all together.

By doing what?

I gave up on the PITA of oxygen and use a Mix Stir now.

Amanda, you get today's pragmatism award!  My experience is that a MixStir works as well as an O2 setup.

Hooray!  8) Do I get a sticker or something? But seriously, on a homebrew level I just don't see the point of pure O2.

I think a mix-stir is just fine for medium gravity ales.  I was always a fan of the old whisk until I started getting whisk-elbow....  :P

But I like using O2 for high gravity ales and lagers.  It was also a Christmas present so if it didn't come from Santa I would probably still be using the mix-stir.

I put my canisters in with the recyclables.  Asked and was told it was not a problem if empty.

Dave

19
Beer Recipes / Re: Amarillo IPA
« on: May 21, 2013, 04:26:47 AM »
I haven't had the chance to read the new Zymurgy, because I just finished the process of moving. I mainly did this to get a taste of straight Amarillo. And I had three pounds on stock and needed to use some, so why not use 9 oz? I did the same with a dry hopped Citra APA not long ago. I had never tried Citra before. It's one of my favorite brews to date. I figure if this beer isn't great, it's still gonna be pretty good.... Kinda like pizza  :P

Exactly.  And if you like it, that is all that matters......

Dave

20
General Homebrew Discussion / Re: Any Hope?? Not much fermentation
« on: May 21, 2013, 04:15:51 AM »
I'm a couple years, 20+ batches in and moving from ales to lagers - lots to learn - THANKS!!!

Just like your first brew, it's not rocket science but you will need to do some reading and research.  Keith mentioned the biggies above.  Pitch yeast in a volume per yeastcalc.com or mrmalty.com in to wort a few degrees below your fermentation temp of 48-52F.  You may wish to perform a diacetyl rest after 7-10 days by raising the temp to 60-65F for a few days to help finish out and clean up the beer.  Lot's of opinions on that one but a cheap insurance policy.

Give it another shot!

Dave

21
Beer Recipes / Re: Amarillo IPA
« on: May 20, 2013, 11:31:14 AM »
I'll just throw this in, in a recent issue of Zymurgy they have a recipe for testing single hops and the author makes a point to say that Amarillo was not good for the 60 minute addition.

That was a statement of opinion. granted from Vinnie at Russian river but still. Try it. Maybe YOU would like it as a 60 minute addition. I find Columbus to be really oniony but others love it.

The other opinion he stated was that while a single hop beer was great for experimenting, it didn't make a good recipe.  I realize that it's subjective, but I agree with him 100%.

These are all opinions, isn't that what the op asked for? Haven't seen the latest Zymurgy best beers but the runner up for 3 straight(IIRC) is a single hop beer. So it seems lots of folks think very highly of a single hop beer as a good recipe. I can't believe it but I have to disagree with Denny and Vinnie, I have really enjoyed some single hop beers.

+1.  I enjoy single hop beers just as much as multiple hopped beers.  Just finished my all-Simcoe IPA which was delicious.

22
Kegging and Bottling / Re: Ideal bottle conditioning temp
« on: May 20, 2013, 06:11:14 AM »
30°C (86°F) is pretty standard for breweries that bottle condition. You're definitely in the ballpark.

Wow.  I had no idea it was that warm.....

23
General Homebrew Discussion / Re: timing a lager D-rest
« on: May 18, 2013, 05:51:42 AM »
good info from everyone. seems like we are all on the same page. it just seemed odd to me to hear people do a d-rest after 2 weeks at 50F...seems all activity would be done and there would be nothing gained from doing a d-rest then (considering a normal lager range around 1.050-055). maybe for bigger beers over 1.060 there would still be fermentation activity near the 2 week mark - i just haven't done a lager that big.

As long as you don't remove the yeast from the beer, it doesn't matter if all activity has ended.  Warming the beer for the d rest will make it active again.

ok good to know. but then whats the difference in doing a d-rest at 80-85% attenuation , vs. 99-100% attenuation ? any benefit of one over the other
If you do it at 80%, the yeast will finish the sugars and be active to reduce the VDKs. The increased activity will help scrub off sulfur. Then you can crash down to cold temps to lager and drop out the haze and yeast. The classic profile has a slow cooling to keep the yeast working, as they will slowly reduce the VDKs at low temperature. 

So you clean it up, blow off sulfur and save time. If you are a homebrewer that brews lagers when the weather allows, saving time in the fermenter is a good thing. Might have to get another freezer someday so I can do lagers in the summer.

That's a good synopsis Jeff.  I was lucky to have my bro-in-law donate a chest freezer to the cause.  I have 4x5G in there at all times at 50F.   Mostly German Lagers.  I brew 10G on Saturday and Sunday, typically raise to 65F for 3 days after a week and then reduce 5F per day to 32F.  I'll leave them on the cake for 3 weeks, then keg and lager in a separate fridge.  My wife has been very kind to let me have two appliances in the garage solely for brewing.  I store all of my bulk hops in the top freezer of the lagering fridge and all of my washed yeast in the door compartments.  Works out real well and I can brew lagers year round.  You've got to get that freezer!

24
General Homebrew Discussion / Re: timing a lager D-rest
« on: May 17, 2013, 11:15:19 AM »
good info from everyone. seems like we are all on the same page. it just seemed odd to me to hear people do a d-rest after 2 weeks at 50F...seems all activity would be done and there would be nothing gained from doing a d-rest then (considering a normal lager range around 1.050-055). maybe for bigger beers over 1.060 there would still be fermentation activity near the 2 week mark - i just haven't done a lager that big.

As long as you don't remove the yeast from the beer, it doesn't matter if all activity has ended.  Warming the beer for the d rest will make it active again.

+1.  You may get a little extra attenuation as well as was previously stated.

Dave

25
General Homebrew Discussion / Re: timing a lager D-rest
« on: May 17, 2013, 06:59:30 AM »
^^^^^^^Sounds good.  I would go with your plan.

Dave

26
General Homebrew Discussion / Re: timing a lager D-rest
« on: May 17, 2013, 06:53:06 AM »
Everything above looks correct except that "all lagers will produce diacetyl".  Not all strains will produce diacetyl and it will mainly depend upon whether you pitch the correct amount of yeast and the fermentation temperature.

That aside, your plan is sound.  IMHO, a D-Rest is mainly insurance if you pitched and fermented correctly.  You may not need one at all, but it will not hurt your beer either. 

I typically wait until I see little to no activity and then raise it up(given an active fermentation).  Others have different processes.  This works for me without having to take numerous gravity readings.

Dave

Maybe someone else can weigh in, but seems to me diacetyl is always produced - just at different levels??

Yes, misstated.  It is always produced but a healthy fermentation will allow the yeast to re-absorb it before FG, some better than others.  Definitely at different levels.

Dave 

27
General Homebrew Discussion / Re: timing a lager D-rest
« on: May 17, 2013, 06:39:34 AM »
Everything above looks correct except that "all lagers will produce diacetyl".  Not all strains will produce diacetyl and it will mainly depend upon whether you pitch the correct amount of yeast and the fermentation temperature.

That aside, your plan is sound.  IMHO, a D-Rest is mainly insurance if you pitched and fermented correctly.  You may not need one at all, but it will not hurt your beer either. 

I typically wait until I see little to no activity and then raise it up(given an active fermentation).  Others have different processes.  This works for me without having to take numerous gravity readings.

Dave


28
Sounds to me like a recipe you may fine tune over time.  Therefore I'm in the no sugar, low mash temp camp.  If it does not get where you want it, try some sugar in round #2.  Also a great project for you and your wife to tinker with together until you both think it's perfect.  Win/win!

I like the wheat addition and the fact that you have no crystal.

Dave

29
Going Pro / Re: Fermentation Temperature Control
« on: May 16, 2013, 06:05:32 AM »
I highly recommend a coolbot to keep the air conditioner working well
http://www.amazon.com/CoolBot-Walk-In-Cooler-Controller-conditioner/dp/B003VSLTAI

Tom, that is a way cool device, pun intended. Never seen this gadget before.

That is very cool.  I've been thinking about converting a part of my basement in to a walk-in for storage.  I can even use one at my mortuary!   ::)

Dave

30
Beer Recipes / Re: Amarillo IPA
« on: May 15, 2013, 09:03:54 AM »
Interesting.  Get some flavor but more bitterness?  Can you explain?

I perceive about the same amount of bittering from FWH as I do from a 20 min. addition.  Now, that's not a hard and fast number and everybody who FWH needs to decide for themselves.  But to me, FWH doesn't provide the same amount and quality of bitterness as a 60 min, addition.  I decide how much hop flavor I want and how much FWH I need to achieve that.  Then I look at how much bitterness that adds (counted as a 20 min. addition) and add enough 50 min. hops to hit the IBU I want.

Thanks Denny.  That's interesting.  I'll have to pay more attention to my FWH additions and the end result.  I use BeerTools and it keeps the bitterness the same.

Edit:  I thought FWH just added some more flavor.....

Dave

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 85