Forum
Login
|
Register
Username:
Password:
News:
Welcome to the American Homebrewers Association Forum. Though you do not need to be a member to participate, we would love for you to join us!
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
Homebrewers Association | AHA Forum
»
General Category
»
General Homebrew Discussion
»
Whirfloc question
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: Whirfloc question (Read 465 times)
gymrat
Brewmaster
Posts: 541
Ralph's Brewery
Whirfloc question
«
on:
October 31, 2012, 10:24:07 am »
I tried whirfloc in the last batch of beer I made. I used S 04 yeast and it had the shortest lag time I have ever experienced with that yeast. Does whirfloc also act as a yeast nutrient? Or was this just a coincidence?
Logged
Ralph's Brewery
Topeka, KS
dbeechum
Administrator
Brewmaster General
Posts: 2187
Pasadena, CA
Re: Whirfloc question
«
Reply #1 on:
October 31, 2012, 10:31:30 am »
I would say just coincidence. Whirlfloc really is just powdered and compressed Irish moss mixed with some binding agents.
Logged
Drew Beechum - Maltosefalcons.com
-----
Burbling:
Mortgage Killer Old Ale
Fat Cat Sweet Stout
Bugged Out Oats
Saison Noir
Tap:
Hunter Barleywine
Tupelo Mead
Farmhouse Brett Saison
bluesman
Global Moderator
I must live here
Posts: 8227
Delaware
Whirfloc question
«
Reply #2 on:
October 31, 2012, 10:54:54 am »
I agree. Probably had a very healthy batch of yeast, which accounted for the minimal lag time. WLP002 has typically fermented rather quickly in my experiences.
Logged
Ron Price
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Homebrewers Association | AHA Forum
»
General Category
»
General Homebrew Discussion
»
Whirfloc question