Homebrewers Association | AHA Forum

General Category => General Homebrew Discussion => Topic started by: klickitat jim on May 22, 2013, 07:21:05 PM

Title: Wrong?
Post by: klickitat jim on May 22, 2013, 07:21:05 PM
I'm enjoying a nice Pilsner Urquell with Clamato. Is that a foul?
Title: Re: Wrong?
Post by: HoosierBrew on May 22, 2013, 07:36:08 PM
People in Prague all got a stomach ache without knowing why :-[
Title: Re: Wrong?
Post by: morticaixavier on May 22, 2013, 07:37:18 PM
just the clamato is foul. the beer doesn't even enter in to the question.

yes, yes drinking calmato is foul. Truly, deeply foul. (Just, like, my opinion, man)
Title: Re: Wrong?
Post by: dak0415 on May 22, 2013, 07:40:29 PM
I'm enjoying a nice Pilsner Urquell with Clamato. Is that a foul?
To each his own on the Clamato, but is that the only beer you had to mix it with?  Just get a six of Bud!
Title: Re: Wrong?
Post by: Pinski on May 22, 2013, 08:04:30 PM
Bi-valves are not meant to be beverages.
Title: Re: Wrong?
Post by: beersk on May 22, 2013, 08:18:40 PM
Oh, dude...yeah, that's wrong. Pilsner Urquell is tasty on its own, why would you deface it like that? I had clamato once at a beer festival, the AB table was handing them out. I said what the hell. Opened it, took a drink and nearly puked. That sh*t really is foul.
Title: Re: Wrong?
Post by: corkybstewart on May 22, 2013, 08:55:03 PM
There's really nothing you can do with a Clamato to make it not foul, except not opening it.  Once you open it you'll have to pour it somewhere-it's not fair to punish bacteria in your gut, the ground or septic tank with that vile stuff.  Pilsner Urquell does go very well with sliced cheeses and dry salami.
Title: Re: Wrong?
Post by: Franklin on May 22, 2013, 09:36:37 PM
Give it to your BEST friends....
Title: Re: Wrong?
Post by: gsandel on May 22, 2013, 09:51:34 PM
the fact that you are enjoying it is what is truly disturbing.
Title: Re: Wrong?
Post by: micah h on May 22, 2013, 09:56:19 PM
I like a red beer. But with V-8 not Clamato. Sometimes with some Tabasco.

Are you doing this with a homebrew? Because that sounds sacrilegious.
Title: Wrong?
Post by: majorvices on May 22, 2013, 10:59:29 PM
If you enjoy it, it's all good, bro!
Title: Re: Wrong?
Post by: beersk on May 22, 2013, 11:03:04 PM
No, he said Pilsner Urquell, which is a good beer on its own. To wreck it with clamato is sacrilegious.

While I agree with what Keith has to say, he did ask if it was wrong...
Title: Re: Wrong?
Post by: davidgzach on May 22, 2013, 11:32:34 PM
Why not a dozen clams on the half-shell rinsed down with the Pilsner Urquell?  Or a bucket of steamers?

I agree Clamato is some foul stuff......

Dave
Title: Re: Wrong?
Post by: klickitat jim on May 23, 2013, 12:11:41 AM
There's just not enough claminess in it.
Title: Re: Wrong?
Post by: corkybstewart on May 23, 2013, 12:13:34 AM
There's just not enough claminess in it.
I get clammy just thinking about it.
Title: Re: Wrong?
Post by: klickitat jim on May 23, 2013, 12:32:46 AM
Actually I just thought that if clamato and cheap is good, why not with a better beer. And I was so right. PU brings a nice graininess to the show. I don't thing clamato and chimay would work though
Title: Re: Wrong?
Post by: a10t2 on May 23, 2013, 01:06:24 AM
You lose me when you start using "clamato" and "good" in the same sentence. ;)
Title: Re: Wrong?
Post by: edvinjonsson on May 23, 2013, 01:35:36 AM
To each his own. I really enjoy clamato with a Pacifico (I live in Mazatlan, so I get it really cheap), and I would much rather have a Corona with clamato than the Corona by itself.