Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - erockrph

Pages: 1 ... 111 112 [113] 114 115 ... 279
1681
Kegging and Bottling / Re: Keg Manufacturer Preference
« on: May 06, 2014, 12:12:32 PM »
Chinese made? If so, report back on how you like them. I have been toying around with picking up two and building a self contained cooler jockey box.
I think the 60 dollar ones on AIH are the all metal bottoms correct?  They look awesome but id be worried about how well the metal holds up to normal handling over time.

I wonder if you could coat the bottom in some sort of polymer, like that liquid truck bed lining stuff just to give it a little renewable durability.

They're my first kegs, so I don't have a lot to compare to. They seem solid, but not indestructible. They will stack, but not with disconnects attached. I had to tighten a post on one of them, but otherwise no leaks as far as I can see. I like the low profile because I only have a small (5.1 gallon) chest freezer and fit four (two tapped) plus a CO2 tank without modifications.

The powder-coat idea sounds interesting. It might be worthwhile if they get banged around a lot. I forsee them getting dinged easily, but could withstand a little abuse. The ring that the dip tube sits over seems solid, and that's the only place I'd be worried about dinging up.

1682
Kegging and Bottling / Re: Keg Manufacturer Preference
« on: May 06, 2014, 10:21:06 AM »
The 2.5 and 3 gallon kegs are gaining some traction on the homebrew scene with the corny style connections and even among commercial brewers for those with sanke connections so hopefully we'll start to see these prices come down.

I just bought four new 2.5 gallon kegs from Adventures in Homebrewing for 60 bucks a piece. Not a bad deal, IMO.

1683
All Grain Brewing / Re: First time doing a true lager
« on: May 06, 2014, 10:19:42 AM »
There are lots of other lager styles out there if you don't like the yellow stuff. Maerzen, bock, dopplebock, schwarzbier, etc. Try a couple before you rule them all out entirely.

1684
General Homebrew Discussion / Re: To clone or not to clone
« on: May 06, 2014, 10:13:45 AM »
Why imitate when you can innovate?

A) You have to start somewhere
B) The challenge
C) You can learn a lot about how to design recipes by brewing proven ones yourself
D) You really like the beer
E) You enjoy one (or many) of the dozens of other parts of our hobby aside from the recipe design process

Why roll the dice on 5 gallons of a brew that might be horrible when you can brew a tried and tested recipe?

Frankly, there's no difference between brewing a clone vs brewing a kit vs brewing someone else's recipe. Unless you're designing every single one of your recipes entirely from scratch, then it's all the same. And even then, if you're brewing a particular style, you're not really innovating anything anyways.

Brew what you like.

1685
Ingredients / Re: Enriched Corn Meal
« on: May 06, 2014, 06:51:52 AM »
Most steel-ground (i.e., degermed) cornmeal is going to be enriched to replace the nutrients that are stripped during processing. Since they're just replacing what has been removed, I don't see an issue. I'm pretty sure most store-bought cornmeal is going to be enriched. I haven't used either, so I can't speak from experience.

1686
All Grain Brewing / Re: Changing step mash to single
« on: May 06, 2014, 06:03:41 AM »
+1 to skipping the Melanoiden malt. Not that I dislike it, but (flavor-wise) I honestly don't think it's a substitute for doing a decoction. There's no need to further alter the recipe, IMO. Just brew the recipe as-is with a single rest at 150ish and you'll be fine.

1687
General Homebrew Discussion / Re: Pics of recent brews?
« on: May 05, 2014, 11:01:34 AM »
Still waiting for it to finish carbing up, but I couldn't wait any longer to pour a tall one. Enjoying a märzen on brewday:


1688
The Pub / Re: Tangents
« on: May 04, 2014, 08:58:48 PM »
Phantom of the Opera would be so much better if they used the Iron Maiden song as the theme.

1689
Beer Recipes / Re: Zymurgy Pacifier IPA recipe
« on: May 04, 2014, 08:56:39 PM »
If you miss low on your OG, the best way to approach it is to either let it ride (if it's close enough for your liking), or use DME to raise the gravity to where you want it. Boiling longer will end up increasing your IBU's and driving off some of the flavor and a lot of the aroma from your late hop additions.

1690
All Grain Brewing / Re: Calculating weight of BIAB grain bag
« on: May 04, 2014, 01:11:19 PM »
I mash 3-gallon BIAB batches in a 5-gallon beverage cooler, and boil in my 5-gallon kettle. Fermcap is required to prevent boilovers, but otherwise it is quite manageable.

I can actually do that (I have a 5-gallon cooler I stopped using when I got a 9-gallon Coleman Xtreme) but I'm curious what I'm getting from this procedure that I don't get from my setup and process, aside from upper-arm exercise. I went no-sparge a few batches back and haven't looked back. So BIAB would be the difference between lifting a bag out of a cooler and transferring the cooler's contents into a kettle, versus opening a ball valve and draining into a kettle (I often do push the boundaries and boil 4 gallons in a 5-gal kettle using Fermcap). The bag won't magically transport its contents to the compost bin, so it needs to go somewhere, and that somewhere will need cleaning as well.

I went the separate cooler mash tun route because I'm lazy and didn't want to deal with monitoring mash temps if I left everything in the kettle. Otherwise, the main advantage of BIAB is that it's a 1-vessel system, so there's no additional equipment beyond the bag.

For me, what I like about the bag vs a manifold/false bottom/bazooka screen is that there's no dead space and less grain absorption. Since I'm only mashing in a 5-gallon cooler, that added efficiency boost lets me brew some bigger beers using my normal setup without having to take extra steps (like adding DME). But frankly, why I really like my system is because I worked it out myself, and because it works well for my purposes (i.e., brewing 3-gallon batches indoors).

Also, if you did want to batch sparge, you could certainly use a bag the same way you'd use a false bottom or screen.

In general, BIAB isn't necessarily a solution to improve all-grain brewing for someone who already has a setup that works for them. But it is an easy way to step up from extract brewing without having to buy a lot of new equipment. It is also quite well suited for brewing smaller batches. If a brewer typically brews 10-15 gallon batches, but wants to brew a 2-gallon pilot batch, then BIAB is a simple option.

1691
Ingredients / Re: Kohatu Hops
« on: May 04, 2014, 10:28:20 AM »
That's funny, because your description actually intrigues me even more to try this hop. Sounds like it would be nice with some citrusy and stone fruity hops in a fruit-bomb type IPA.

1692
General Homebrew Discussion / Re: Spring 2014 Brewing
« on: May 04, 2014, 10:24:36 AM »
Got a Bo Pils on deck for Monday and Doppelbock the following week. That will be it for lagers for a while. Things will probably slow down with my brewing in general as well. I'll probably do a bunch of easy 1-gallon batches here & there, but as the weather warms up I'll be spending more time in the garden than the brewery.

1693
The Pub / Re: Happy Star Wars Day.
« on: May 04, 2014, 10:15:37 AM »

1694
The Pub / Re: Tangents
« on: May 04, 2014, 10:13:45 AM »
Speaking of kids, I can't wait for farmers market season to start up so I can get some fresh local goat cheese. Nothing like a good chèvre with beets.

1695
Yeast and Fermentation / Re: When Should I Call It?
« on: May 04, 2014, 09:44:06 AM »
Well, I gave it 30 hours and then pitched the 860 which took off in 6 hours and is now done.  You were all wrong..... :o ;D

Dave

I still say you probably just didn't give it long enough. I pitched a Smack Pack of WY2000 dated early Feb around 8pm on Thursday into a 2.5 L starter. Saturday AM (T+36:00 hours) it still didn't look like anything was going on when I shook it up, but I could start to smell a little bit of fermentation character. When I got home Saturday night (T+48:00 hours) it was chugging along and foamed up heavily when I swirled it up.

I think that A) lagers don't tend to be vigorous fermenters and B) starters tend to be larger so the initial lag phase takes longer before you start to see visible signs of fermentation.

Pages: 1 ... 111 112 [113] 114 115 ... 279