Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - denny

Pages: 1 ... 658 659 [660] 661 662 ... 875
General Homebrew Discussion / Re: Dornbusch's Advice for Alt?
« on: January 04, 2011, 09:13:54 AM »
As Stan Hieronymus (Brewing with Wheat, Brew like a Monk) put it...he is not an expert, but he took the time to find out from experts in authoring his books.

So, I wouldn't be surprised that Dornbusch doesn't really have any expertise either, but I would hope that he took the initiative to consult experts in writing his book.  

My hat's off to those who do take the time and effort to author good work.  But as we know, the state of the art moves on.  The problem is that there aren't many forums such as this to help dispell the missinformation that still exists until an updated edition comes out.  

My understanding is that he was a commercial brewer.  Years ago (maybe 10) a friend of mine emailed him about the seeming strangeness of his recipes.  Dornbusch wrote back a very good defense of his reasoning.  Didn't convince me, but it was at least some interesting info.  I'm trying to find that email.

EDIT:  Found it!  From 2004...

"Thank you for your two inquiries about Alt and Sticke.


Let me first respond to the Sticke question about replacing carared with melanoidin malt.


Carared is one of the typical malts used in Germany to impart ¡°reddishness¡± to Alts, Vienna lagers, and similar brews. Carared is slightly aromatic and contributes a relatively mild maltiness as well as some body to the finished beer. I recall having been told by a maltster that a grain bill should contain no more than 25% carared or 20% melanoidin malt, but I do not know why this limitation.


Replacing the carared with melanoidin malt is perfectly OK, but I would use a little less melanoidin than carared, if you are looking for a comparable result. This reason lies in the different specs:


Melanoidin malts tend to be slightly darker (the Weyermann product, for instance, comes in a color range of 23 ¨C 31¡ãL/SRM, compared to the Weyermann Carared at 16 ¨C 23¡ãL/SRM). Melanoidin malts tend to be slightly more acidic than carared malts. This enhances flavor stability, but you should check you mash pH. (Perhaps this is the reason for the 20%-limit on melanoidin malt? If the mash becomes too acidic, the diastatic enzymes won¡¯t work!) Melanoidin malts also have excellent friability and fairly low ¦Â-glucan values. This enhances lautering performance. They are more malt-aromatic (which is OK in an Alt. including a Sticke) and add more body and mouthfeel to the finished beer (also OK). Importantly, however, melanoidin malts (as opposed to carareds) add deep-amber to red-brown, rather than brilliantly reddish, color values to the beer. For the Sticke, therefore, mostly because of the color contribution, I would use no more than perhaps 15% melanoidin malt (instead of the 20% carared in my Zymurgy recipe).


As for the amount of crystal malt I mention in some of the Alt recipes in my book, the answer is more complex:


I tried to cover the wide range of Altbiers that I have tasted both in Germany and in the US. At one end of the spectrum is the Schmalz¡¯s Alt from Minnesota, for instance (see p. 114 -- not sure if it is still available nowadays). It seems to contain a TON of highly roasted malts. At the other end of the spectrum is the Schumacher Alt, which is made from just one type of Munich malt (which I happen to know is Weyermann Munich Type I producing a wort of 5.1 - 7.3¡ãL/SRM ). The Enderlein Alt recipe (pp. 105/106) is based entirely on this brew.


The crystal quantities I mention in some of the recipes are deliberate. No typos. In D¨¹sseldorf, there are clear differences between, say a F¨¹chschen or Uehrige Alt, on the one hand, and a Hannen or Diebels Alt, on the other. The former are lighter-copper in color with very little residual sweetness in the finish, while the latter are more reddish-brown with a much maltier aftertaste. I happen to know that the color in the darker D¨¹sseldorf Altbiers comes from the addition by those breweries of a malt-essence coloring agent called SINAMAR. This is a patented tincture made by the Weyermann Malting Company of Bamberg. It was invented n 1903. It is made entirely made from a vacuum-evaporated, unhopped beer brewed just from dehusked Weyermann Carafa malt. Because the grain base of this product is dehusked, there is no bitterness associated with this liquid, just dark concentrated color. Because it is made entirely from barley, it meets the requirements of the German Reinheitsgebot, which makes it a legal ¡°additive¡± to beer.


When I wrote the manuscript for the Alt book in 1997/8, SINAMAR was not available in North America, so I did not mention it then. For the darker versions of Altbier, therefore, I resorted to crystal malt for color in the book. To avoid roasty notes, though, I kept the color value to no more than 60¡ãL. Now, since last year, SINAMAR is available in the United States, where it is imported and distributed by Crosby & Baker. Of course, I would mention SINAMAR as an option today.


The grain bill of my own commercial Alt, which won a bronze medal at the 2000 GABF, contained about 15% crystal from Briess, at 60¡ãL. As a test, I once made the same Altbier by replacing the Briess crystal with an equivalent amount (calculated on color value, not weight) of Carastan Malt. This malt is roasted at about 300¡ãF (150¡ãC). The mathematical color value of the two brews was supposed to be identical, but visually the Carastan beer turned out almost as dark as a Porter, compared to the brilliant copper-red color of the Briess crystal beer. The two beers also tasted completely differently. The Carastan Alt tasted too acrid and toffee-toasty to be an Alt. The Briess Alt, by contrast, was even identified in a blind taste test by the best-known German-language beer writer, Conrad Seidl, as being an authentic Alt.


From this I conclude that you can both succeed and fail in making an authentic Altbier with crystal. What I was after in the recipes in which I used crystal (and I tested them all!), was color without roastiness. If you rely on crystal for color, they key, at least in my experience, is to get the right BRAND of crystal. You want a crystal malt that is stewed longer at lower temperatures rather than faster at higher temperatures. Also, you want a crystal malt that is produced in a roasting drum, not in a kilning box. For these reasons, I disclosed on p. 34 of the book, that I had used Briess malt for all the test batches. I did not disclose the brand to give Briess a plug, but because I knew the recipes worked with this brand. Weyermann malts work well too, by the way.


I understand why some people do not believe I should have used crystal at all (or up to 15%) in the recipes, but the reality is that these critics may not be sufficiently familiar with ALL the varieties of Alt that are and have been brewed in and around D¨¹sseldorf, as well as in Westphalia (with lots of wheat in the grain bill), Frankfurt, Dortmund, Hanover (with lots of crystal!), and even Bavaria (with plenty of residual sweetness). My goal was to be both authentic and comprehensive, while supplying recipes that could actually be made in North America with the ingredients available (then!).


I hope this explains, why there is crystal in some (though not all!) of the Alt brews in my book. The explanation I am giving you here is probably something that I should have included explicitly in the original book manuscript. If you could rewrite the book today, I certainly would do so. Please, feel free to disseminate this information to everybody in your discussion group, and keep me in the loop.





P.S. Amidst the many complimentary reviews the Alt book has received since publication, there was a small sprinkling of inexplicably vicious and dismissive attacks, mostly by self-appointed, self-important know-it-all experts who have obviously never been in a real Altbier brew house or talked to a real Altbier brew master. I did not grace any of these uncivil broadsides with a reply, because their opinionated and dogmatic tone made dialog a priori impossible. However, I gladly reply to your query. Thank you for being a gentleman."

General Homebrew Discussion / Re: Dornbusch's Advice for Alt?
« on: January 04, 2011, 09:10:23 AM »
How long does 1007 typically take at 56F?

Maybe a couple weeks...

All Grain Brewing / Re: Schematic
« on: January 03, 2011, 03:41:16 PM »
Thanks again.
I checked out Denny's site and that does look pretty simple although it probably won't get me onto the Pimp my System page.  I guess it may be more important to actually brew beer than look good doing it.

Hey, YOU can look good even if the setup doesn't!  :)  I'm in it to brew beer, not to impress people with how shiny my setup is!

General Homebrew Discussion / Re: What's your first brew for 2011?
« on: January 03, 2011, 03:10:06 PM »
I figured you'd be heavy into lagers at this time of year, chumley.

Ingredients / Re: Palmer Spreadsheet Error
« on: January 03, 2011, 10:59:11 AM »
Martin, I've been looking for pickling lime with no luck.  Where do you get it?  A grocery store?  That's where I've been looking.

I've seen at it our regular grocery stores around here.  In the section with sugar/flour/spices and such.

Thanks.  I'll keep looking.

Ingredients / Re: Palmer Spreadsheet Error
« on: January 03, 2011, 10:33:57 AM »
Martin, I've been looking for pickling lime with no luck.  Where do you get it?  A grocery store?  That's where I've been looking.

All Grain Brewing / Re: Some basic knowledge help, please.
« on: January 03, 2011, 09:56:28 AM »
As a batch sparger, I stir often and pretty strongly.  I'd be a prime candidate for HSA, yet I've never experienced it.

General Homebrew Discussion / Re: What's your first brew for 2011?
« on: January 03, 2011, 09:54:34 AM »
Hey, Al, is that Knucklehead?

The Pub / Re: How low can you go?
« on: January 03, 2011, 09:48:03 AM »
I'd say Fat Tire is about as low as I'll go.  I don't judge others by what they drink...if you like, drink's OK with me.  But I'll drink water before I'll drink a NAIL.

The Pub / Re: "No refusal" DUI checkpoints could be coming to Tamp
« on: January 03, 2011, 09:29:13 AM »
There is another way. People take the responsibility not to drive impaired. Then this discussion wouldn't exist.

This is true here and of so many things...if only there was personal responsibility.  Of course, we're dealing with humans here.

The Pub / Re: "No refusal" DUI checkpoints could be coming to Tamp
« on: January 02, 2011, 04:41:50 PM »
Thanks for your thoughtful post.  You raise some really good points.

General Homebrew Discussion / Re: What's your first brew for 2011?
« on: January 02, 2011, 03:40:18 PM »
Just completed my first brew of 2011...a dunkel, kind of a cross between Munich and Czech.  Exceeded both my OG and volume expectations for 88% efficiency.  I was shooting for 5.5 gal. at 1.056 and got 5.75 gal. at 1.062. Hope that's a harbinger for the rest of the year!

The Pub / Re: "No refusal" DUI checkpoints could be coming to Tamp
« on: January 02, 2011, 02:02:15 PM »
To Denny: Delete offending post, not me altogether ;D


The world would be a duller place if I deleted YOU!  :)  I'm not deleting anything at this time, and I hope that no one gives me any reason to.

The Pub / Re: "No refusal" DUI checkpoints could be coming to Tamp
« on: January 02, 2011, 01:49:56 PM »
I agree...delete me as necessary.

No deletion, no thread locking...yet.  As long as everyone respects the rules, I'll respect your right to post.

The Pub / Re: "No refusal" DUI checkpoints could be coming to Tamp
« on: January 02, 2011, 01:31:00 PM »
Please keep this to the original point, and its legality and morality.  We're drifting into some dangerous territory.

Pages: 1 ... 658 659 [660] 661 662 ... 875