Suppose Marshall puts LODO to the test. He only follows a few of the LODO techniques and finds no significant difference.I agree but Marshall was the one that mentioned a vested interest. Granted Big Monk baited him. I was pointing out that Marshall could easily be accused of the same thing. I like his experiments but if one accused him of bias because of it that's a fair point.
Response- hey dummy, you missed X Y and Z. Valid argument.
Response- oh ya? Well, you have advertising and sell t-shirts. Invalid argument that doesn't really make the thing look all that good.
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk