Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - The Professor

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 58
16
All Things Food / Re: Alcohol Removal Time
« on: December 02, 2015, 08:42:02 AM »
Why would you want to get rid of alcohol?   :o
Seriously??
If there was a way to remove the alcohol from beer and still have it truly taste like beer, I'd be all over it!  I love beer, but I hate feeling drunk.  Unfortunately, there seems to be no way to get the all or most of the alcohol out without adversely affecting the flavor.
There are a few N/A beers I'll buy from time to time which are minimally tolerable, but they still come up very short in the flavor department.

17
The Pub / Re: Creed
« on: November 29, 2015, 12:03:21 PM »
Just got my awards committee screener DVD in the mail on Friday and am looking forward to watching it.  I've had mixed feelings about some of the sequels but have heard good things about this one. 
Still pretty amazing that Sly has been able to keep revisiting the character and keep the  'Rocky' franchise going for going on 40 years.

What awards committee are you on?

It's for the Screen Actor's Guild Awards (I've been a Guild member since 1977). 
This year I am on the nominating committee for the Motion Picture awards (there is also a committee for the Television side of things).  The awards are presented every year, in January.

18
The Pub / Re: Creed
« on: November 29, 2015, 10:51:35 AM »
Just got my awards committee screener DVD in the mail on Friday and am looking forward to watching it.  I've had mixed feelings about some of the sequels but have heard good things about this one. 
Still pretty amazing that Sly has been able to keep revisiting the character and keep the  'Rocky' franchise going for going on 40 years.

19
Beer Recipes / Re: 20% Munich + 4% caramunich too much for a stout?
« on: November 24, 2015, 08:59:16 PM »
It doesn't look bad at all to me.  In fact, except for the Chocolate malt (which I rarely use because I don't like the character it adds) it's very similar to my own standard Porter.
And since historically Porter and Stout are essentially the same thing, any difference between the two is strictly either a matter of opinion, or a product of any modern biases with regard to the two categories.
(And opinions with regard to that are sure to vary as well. ;D)

20
General Homebrew Discussion / Re: Adapting Home Brew Recipes
« on: November 14, 2015, 09:56:05 AM »
It helps to use brewing software.  Brewer's Friend, Brew Pal, BeerSmith, et cetera; they offer scaling and then you can additionally adjust ratios and hop additions for what ingredients you have available.
This. 
I'm not a luddite by any stretch of the definition, but I resisted using brewing software for a long time... but the right application really does help a lot.  I was able to try them all (since a Mac will run both Windows and MacOS with equal power and minimal fuss) and can only say, as I have in previous postings,  that if you are considering a software solution and happen to be running MacOS, it really doesn't get any better than Beer Alchemy

These sorts of brewing apps generally have similar degrees of accuracy with regard to calculations and the like, but off all of them, Beer Alchemy has the best and most intuitive and friendly user interface of them all.  And I find the accuracy of it's various calculations to be amazingly spot-on.

I'm not connected in any way with the developers of the application...just a very satisfied user, for almost five years (after having tried all of the others).

21
Kegging and Bottling / Re: poor man's bottling from the keg procedure
« on: November 08, 2015, 11:09:09 AM »
That's why a lot us over-carb slightly before bottling.

BINGO!
As a result, the stopper/wand method has always produced perfectly conditioned bottles for me.  Purging the bottles prior to filling has also reulted in bottle aged strong beers that were perfectly fine years after bottling from keg.

22
My list is short:
1)  The Survivor (origin unknown, handed to me as a slurry in a mayo jar back in the early 80s and saved on slants after going through around 30 generations)
2)  1272/BRY97 (original Ballantine ale strain) (probably should be #1...it's my most used choice this year)
3)  1099
4)  1968

I've played around with lots of others over the years, but these four are the core to which I always return (I like repeatability and so see little point in switching up yeasts very often).

23
...If you purchase a bad beer from the  retailer, inform the retailer. Once beer leave the brewery, it is beyond brewery control. You can inform them about your experience but do not expect replacement from them...
Some would be glad to hear of any problems, but from some you could expect a yawn at the vey least...same goes for distributors. Or in some cases, worse.

A number of years ago I called the NJ distributor for an established and very respected West Coast brewer, after several times having a less than satisfying experience with both bottles and drafts of what is normally an excellent product.  I was not only brushed off by the distributor, but firmly schooled by his response:  "I only sell this crap, I don't make it, so once it's delivered and paid for, how it tastes is not my fscking problem.   His words

I guess I shouldn't have been too surprised...his company was also NJ's largest AB distributor. LOL

24
Kegging and Bottling / Re: Flow Control Faucet without line
« on: November 08, 2015, 10:04:31 AM »
Looks like an interesting item...it would probably work well for my system since I really don't like typical "American" levels of carbonation (especially for  hoppier ales).   I'd probably grab one of these if they became available in the states.  I wonder if they sell just the interface unit without the faucet (the area where the actual faucet attaches looks to be fairly standard).
By my calcs, the selling price for the unit pictured equates to about $100US

25
Kegging and Bottling / Re: No joy in kegging
« on: November 08, 2015, 09:56:55 AM »
I like the relax, 2 weeks at serving pressure. I've learned that beer carbonated straight from the fermenter isn't nearly as good as beer one month in the keg. Brew more, get more kegs, and then there is no rush. Just MO of course.
I'm definitely in agreement on that.  An undisturbed  month in the keg does wonders...but 2-3 months is (for me) ideal, resulting in much better tasting brew.  The concept of serving beer a week or two after it is brewed is one of the things that keeps me away from most brewpubs. ("Freshness" is vastly overrated...I hate green tasting beer).

Of course, as coolman correctly points out,  if you go that route the trick is to brew frequently enough to always have properly conditioned (or in my preference, aged) brew ready to consume.

26
Ingredients / Re: Oats
« on: October 31, 2015, 04:12:30 PM »
I've used flaked, rolled, quick, and instant oats at various times.
After a lot of experimentation, I determined that the quick or instant oats gave the best results (and were easier to use).
But any of these will work. 

I wouldn't use steel cut though.  Save those for cooking with dried fruit for breakfast... or to make Goetta (aka "Cincinatti Scrapple")

27
Commercial Beer Reviews / Re: What's your favorite hidden gem
« on: October 25, 2015, 02:35:47 PM »
I recently stumbled on a sixpack of Stegmaier Porter (Pennsylvania)...I was surprised to see it, since the last time I had it was more than 40 years ago.  These days it's brewed at The Lion in Wilkes Barre, PA...and it's fantastic (and a real bargain, too).  It's 'chewier' than the other famous PA porter (from Yuengling) and quite nice.
I actually prefer the old timey PA porters from these two brewers over most craft brewer porters (except perhaps for Anchor Porter...which is still a real gem).

28
Beer Recipes / Re: recipe formulation with nugget/cascade/
« on: October 25, 2015, 02:23:37 PM »
I on the other hand, being a big proponent of single hop brews,  have made a number of them (including IPAs and Porters) with Nugget alone and absolutely loved the results.
It totally depends on your personal taste, and the only way to dial that in is to brew with it and try the results for yourself.
The interwebs are a great place for getting info and opinions, but sometimes (especially in food or brewing forums) it's to easy to get steered away from something you'd potentially like by listening to other opinions (no matter how well intentioned they may be).

So while I can definitely see where Nugget by itself may not be for every taste...but it may be to yours.  It most certainly was to mine  8)

29
Kegging and Bottling / Re: carbonating with soda syphon
« on: October 25, 2015, 02:14:46 PM »
I dont know. But I recently got one of these. Works great. Especially for quick carbing small samples for a final taste test before packaging.


I got one of these when they first came out many years ago and they're great, work quite well with bog-standard plastic pop bottles of any size, and it offers some control over the level of carbonation to boot.  Definitely much better than trying to use a siphon bottle.
I don't use it regularly, but it has most definitely come in handy on many occasions.
And it works.

30
Yeast and Fermentation / Re: How Pilsner Urquell used to be made
« on: October 16, 2015, 06:40:38 PM »

Love the beer hunter stuff even more now that traditional brewers are closing/merging/changing etc.  Great history!

I wish that the Discovery Channel would re-release these videos on DVD.  I wonder if they were recorded in 4:3?
Most likely shot in 4:3

Given that the original footage was shot on film (rather than video)  so many  years ago...most likely in the 16mm format...  it's a safe bet that the aspect ratio of the original footage was indeed 4:3.
However, that aside, if the original film elements were properly preserved, they should yield very high quality without artificial enhancement  if transferred to modern high definition video format for re-release.  One could only hope though that if that is ever done, they retain the original 4:3 ratio and avoid the temptation to crop top and bottom for widescreen, unless it is done with great care and on a shot-by-shot basis.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 58