[jimrod]

Is my low brew house efficiency due to the Bazooka screen ?
Is a false bottom better for this purpose ?

[a10t2]

Is my low brew house efficiency due to the Bazooka screen ?

Possibly. You can't know without a full set of measurements. Grist weight, strike volume, sparge volume, first and last runnings gravities, etc.

Is a false bottom better for this purpose ?

Only if you're fly sparging.

[jimrod]

yes I am fly sparging

[mabrungard]

There is no mention of how large the mashing vessel is and the length of the screen.  If the vessel is much longer than the screen, then might have some effect.  But, I find that the most influential variable for efficiency is the length of time used for the runoff and sparging.  The longer the time, the higher the efficiency.  Go slow.

[kramerog]

You haven't described the geometry of your mash tun or your bazooka screen.  See John Palmer re proper manifold design for fly sparging http://www.howtobrew.com/appendices/appendixD-1.html

For troubleshooting brewhouse efficiency generally  go to http://braukaiser.com/wiki/index.php?title=Troubleshooting_Brewhouse_Efficiency

[snowtiger87]

I use a double bazooka screen (the T kind which is about 12 inches long) in a converted 15.5 gallon sanke keg and I consistently get 85% efficiency out of it. I fly sparge and usually take about 45 minutes to get 13 gallons in the kettle.

[ukolowiczd]

I use a braided hose probably 20 or so inches in circumference and get 83% fly sparing and 68% batch sparging. What efficiency are you getting? System?

[denny]

I use a braided hose probably 20 or so inches in circumference and get 83% fly sparing and 68% batch sparging. What efficiency are you getting? System?

Wow, that's a huge difference.  I got 86% on a batch sparge yesterday.  Wonder why you get such a difference.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

[gymrat]

What color is your mash tun?

[ukolowiczd]

I use a braided hose probably 20 or so inches in circumference and get 83% fly sparing and 68% batch sparging. What efficiency are you getting? System?

Wow, that's a huge difference.  I got 86% on a batch sparge yesterday.  Wonder why you get such a difference

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

I don't know either. I actually got 71% on Monday but I did some pre-boil calculations and decided to boil for 90 minutes to get it there. My out tube is pretty small 3/8"? I think. Could a slower b/c of constricted tube cause lower efficiency. Like I said, same system gets me 83% when I fly sparge for an hour.

[a10t2]

Like I said, same system gets me 83% when I fly sparge for an hour.

What's your conversion efficiency? It sounds like you aren't finished at the end of the mash rest, and the long sparge is giving you extra time to get full conversion.

[jimrod]

I use a keggle with a 12'' bazooka screen. There is no dead space.

[majorvices]

I use a braided hose probably 20 or so inches in circumference and get 83% fly sparing and 68% batch sparging. What efficiency are you getting? System?

Wow, that's a huge difference.  I got 86% on a batch sparge yesterday.  Wonder why you get such a difference.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

Agree, that's a huge difference and doesn't jive with my experience at all. I get around 80% batch sparging using a braid in a stainless "keggle".

[denny]

Like I said, same system gets me 83% when I fly sparge for an hour.

What's your conversion efficiency? It sounds like you aren't finished at the end of the mash rest, and the long sparge is giving you extra time to get full conversion.

That's a good thought, Sean.  I guess the hat didn't kill your brain after all! 

[mabrungard]

That's a good thought, Sean.  I guess the hat didn't kill your brain after all! 

If I'm not mistaken, I was sitting just to the right of Sean in that picture.  He was doing a fair job of killing brain cells at the time.