Membership questions? Log in issues? Email info@brewersassociation.org

Author Topic: Filtering  (Read 7121 times)

Offline Thirsty_Monk

  • Brewmaster General
  • *******
  • Posts: 2514
  • Eau Claire WI
    • Lazy Monk Brewing
Filtering
« on: March 08, 2013, 01:31:19 pm »
I just want to share an experience with new filter I have.
It is Pall housing with SupraDiskII Cartridges.

It was easy to set up, run and clean.
Cartridges (they call them modules) are reusable and housing does not need to be dis-assembled after each run.
Here are a few pictures:


and
Na Zdravie

Lazy Monk Brewing
http://www.lazymonkbrewing.com

Offline Pawtucket Patriot

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1367
  • Rebelling against cheap swill since 2005
    • Bauhaus Brew Labs
Re: Filtering
« Reply #1 on: March 08, 2013, 06:44:35 pm »
Nice!  I've been looking into DE filters recently.  Not sure if we will actually filter our beer, but I'd like to know more about it.
Matt Schwandt | Minneapolis, MN
AHA Member

Partial-Mash Pictorial
All-Grain Pictorial

Offline Thirsty_Monk

  • Brewmaster General
  • *******
  • Posts: 2514
  • Eau Claire WI
    • Lazy Monk Brewing
Re: Filtering
« Reply #2 on: March 08, 2013, 07:43:03 pm »
Stay away from DE.
That is my opinion.
Na Zdravie

Lazy Monk Brewing
http://www.lazymonkbrewing.com

Offline Pawtucket Patriot

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1367
  • Rebelling against cheap swill since 2005
    • Bauhaus Brew Labs
Re: Filtering
« Reply #3 on: March 09, 2013, 06:00:20 am »
Stay away from DE.
That is my opinion.

Any particular reason?  Is it too costly?  Too difficult to maintain?
Matt Schwandt | Minneapolis, MN
AHA Member

Partial-Mash Pictorial
All-Grain Pictorial

Offline majorvices

  • Global Moderator
  • I must live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 11334
  • Polka. If its too loud you're too young.
Filtering
« Reply #4 on: March 09, 2013, 06:29:44 am »
Thanks for the post, I was looking at that exact model. Where did you get it from?

Offline a10t2

  • Official Poobah of No Life. (I Got Ban Hammered by Drew)
  • *********
  • Posts: 4696
  • Ask me why I don't like Chico!
    • SeanTerrill.com
Re: Filtering
« Reply #5 on: March 09, 2013, 07:58:04 am »
I've never used a lenticular filter, but I'd choose DE (well, Perlite, obviously) over plate-and-frame.
Sent from my Microsoft Bob

Beer is like porn. You can buy it, but it's more fun to make your own.
Refractometer Calculator | Batch Sparging Calculator | Two Mile Brewing Co.

Offline Thirsty_Monk

  • Brewmaster General
  • *******
  • Posts: 2514
  • Eau Claire WI
    • Lazy Monk Brewing
Re: Filtering
« Reply #6 on: March 09, 2013, 08:55:31 am »
I bought it from Enpro a "local supplier". Well they are in IL but have a office in Minneapolis.

Major pall had a sales rep on ProBrewer forum that was able to give a quote. If you want I could find it.
IMO DE is difficult to run and when you are done you still have filtering media to despise off.

As with all new equipment. It will take some time to get comfortable. The biggest concern is infection. Because modules are washable and unit does not break down after use. This is also the biggest advantage.

Close by brewery is able to run 1500 BBL thru one set of modules before replacement.
Na Zdravie

Lazy Monk Brewing
http://www.lazymonkbrewing.com

Offline majorvices

  • Global Moderator
  • I must live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 11334
  • Polka. If its too loud you're too young.
Filtering
« Reply #7 on: March 10, 2013, 08:19:37 am »
I've never used a lenticular filter, but I'd choose DE (well, Perlite, obviously) over plate-and-frame.

I have never used a DE filter but the other local brewery in Huntssville which is a quite a bit bigger than us had 2 plate filters before the acquired their DE filter and they sold both of their plate filters so I don't doubt you are right.

We acquired one of their plate filters but I have not used it yet. But I just hired a guy who has a lot of winery experience and is used to working with plate filters and so he'll be doing the filtering. :)

Offline Thirsty_Monk

  • Brewmaster General
  • *******
  • Posts: 2514
  • Eau Claire WI
    • Lazy Monk Brewing
Re: Filtering
« Reply #8 on: March 10, 2013, 11:52:05 am »
I was deciding between plate and frame and lenticular.

It boils down to this:
Plate and frame you constantly change filter media.
With diverted plate you can do two stage filtering.

lenticular modules are cleanable and reusable.
If you want to do do two stage filtering you need to have two filters.

If you already have plate and frame use it.
Na Zdravie

Lazy Monk Brewing
http://www.lazymonkbrewing.com

Offline Thirsty_Monk

  • Brewmaster General
  • *******
  • Posts: 2514
  • Eau Claire WI
    • Lazy Monk Brewing
Re: Filtering
« Reply #9 on: March 20, 2013, 06:33:12 pm »
Just an update.

I was filtering the other day.
I filtered 10.5 BBL final in BT in about 35 minuted.

Easy to set up and easy to clean.
The only difference I noticed is that beer is just a little lighter in color and has worst head retention.
Flavor is about the same.
I might have to go with little corset modules.

So far LOVE it.
Na Zdravie

Lazy Monk Brewing
http://www.lazymonkbrewing.com

Offline anthony

  • Brewer
  • ****
  • Posts: 263
  • Hoppy to help!
    • Triptych
Re: Filtering
« Reply #10 on: March 20, 2013, 09:53:47 pm »
What sort of waste? Do you anticipate any sort of customer reaction to finding out you're filtering? I have a fair number of people ask if we are (we don't, we currently use a two-part fining regimen).

Offline Pawtucket Patriot

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1367
  • Rebelling against cheap swill since 2005
    • Bauhaus Brew Labs
Filtering
« Reply #11 on: March 21, 2013, 07:43:06 am »
Not to hijack, but how many of you guys who aren't filtering are using finings?  And, for those using finings, are you adding them in addition to a cold conditioning period or in place of one?
Matt Schwandt | Minneapolis, MN
AHA Member

Partial-Mash Pictorial
All-Grain Pictorial

Offline tschmidlin

  • I must live here
  • **********
  • Posts: 8198
  • Redmond, WA
Re: Filtering
« Reply #12 on: March 21, 2013, 10:17:18 am »
I just use super moss.  It's good enough for our purposes.
Tom Schmidlin

Offline kylekohlmorgen

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1363
  • Saint Louis, MO
    • The South House Pilot Brewery
Re: Filtering
« Reply #13 on: March 21, 2013, 10:30:25 am »
What sort of waste? Do you anticipate any sort of customer reaction to finding out you're filtering? I have a fair number of people ask if we are (we don't, we currently use a two-part fining regimen).

I hope that filtering is another educational frontier, much like hops or sour/wild beers have been in the past.

I think marketing has convinced consumers that "unfiltered" is a true sign of an artisanal, local, and/or hand-crafted beer. The average craft beer drinker has been conditioned to think of filtering as industrial or artificial. In truth, filtering is an expensive and labor-intensive choice the brewer makes to ensure their beer's quality, consistency, and shelf life.

Hopefully craft brewers can help shed some light on this subject. Bravo to those of you taking on the financial and labor burden of filtering!
Twitter/Instagram: @southhousebrew

Recipes, Brett/Bacteria Experiments: http://SouthHouseBeer.com/

Offline majorvices

  • Global Moderator
  • I must live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 11334
  • Polka. If its too loud you're too young.
Filtering
« Reply #14 on: March 21, 2013, 11:47:26 am »
I personally think you lose a good bit of flavor when you filter. It's just a fast way to condition beer IMO.certain beers like Kolsch may be better for it but others like pales and iPas suffer.