Author Topic: Wheat malt...poor extraction  (Read 2978 times)

Offline roguejim

  • Brewer
  • ****
  • Posts: 469
    • View Profile
Wheat malt...poor extraction
« on: July 06, 2013, 11:16:51 AM »
I just started brewing a hefe, not a style I normally brew.  The last time my BG was way off on the low side.  I attributed it to not getting a good crush on the wheat malt.  So, today I double-crushed the wheat malt.  The BG was still low by 8 points.  I used 6.25 lbs wheat, 6 lbs pils, and 1 lb rice hulls.  Single infusion mash.  Aside from increasing the grain bill next time to make up for the loss in efficiency, is there something I'm missing?  Is there a better "cure" for this anomaly?  Thanks.

Offline denny

  • Administrator
  • Retired with too much time on my hands
  • *****
  • Posts: 16602
  • Noti OR [1991.4, 287.6deg] AR
    • View Profile
    • Dennybrew
Re: Wheat malt...poor extraction
« Reply #1 on: July 06, 2013, 11:48:39 AM »
Ot could be that the number you're using for the potential extract of the wheat malt is higher than the malt really is.  Just a WAG.....what potential are you using?
Life begins at 60.....1.060, that is!

www.dennybrew.com

The best, sharpest, funniest, weirdest and most knowledgable minds in home brewing contribute on the AHA forum. - Alewyfe

"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell

Offline roguejim

  • Brewer
  • ****
  • Posts: 469
    • View Profile
Re: Wheat malt...poor extraction
« Reply #2 on: July 06, 2013, 07:59:22 PM »
Ot could be that the number you're using for the potential extract of the wheat malt is higher than the malt really is.  Just a WAG.....what potential are you using?

uh...whatever Promash uses under German wheat malt.  I'm using Bestmalz.

Offline dmtaylor

  • Brewmaster General
  • *******
  • Posts: 2207
  • Two Rivers, WI
    • View Profile
Re: Wheat malt...poor extraction
« Reply #3 on: July 07, 2013, 06:29:55 AM »
The mill might not be tight enough.  Try a triple crush!?!?1
Dave

"This is grain, which any fool can eat, but for which the Lord intended a more divine means of consumption. Let us give praise to our Maker, and glory to His bounty, by learning about... BEER!" - Friar Tuck (Robin Hood - Prince of Thieves)

Offline roguejim

  • Brewer
  • ****
  • Posts: 469
    • View Profile
Re: Wheat malt...poor extraction
« Reply #4 on: July 07, 2013, 09:24:55 AM »
Correction:  Bestmalz is my pils malt.  The wheat malt is whatever German brand the LHBS is selling.

As for the crush, my mill is set such that my efficiency runs 75-77% for all brews in the ~1.050 range.  This hefe came in at 64%.  Maybe I'll have the LHBS pulverize the crap out of it next time since I don't want to mess with my mill on the few occasions when I brew a wheat beer.

Offline kylekohlmorgen

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1363
  • Saint Louis, MO
    • View Profile
    • The South House Pilot Brewery
Re: Wheat malt...poor extraction
« Reply #5 on: July 08, 2013, 11:38:31 AM »
There is a previous thread on efficiency loss with adjuncts, but I can't find it.

Most replies noted a loss in efficiency when using wheat or rye. I tend to see a 5-7% loss when using a considerable amount of either.
Twitter/Instagram: @southhousebrew

Recipes, Brett/Bacteria Experiments: http://SouthHouseBeer.com/

Offline beersk

  • Official Poobah of No Life.
  • *
  • Posts: 3198
  • In the night!
    • View Profile
Re: Wheat malt...poor extraction
« Reply #6 on: July 08, 2013, 11:47:01 AM »
There is a previous thread on efficiency loss with adjuncts, but I can't find it.

Most replies noted a loss in efficiency when using wheat or rye. I tend to see a 5-7% loss when using a considerable amount of either.
Same here, it's kind of a bummer.
None More Black!

Jesse

Offline kramerog

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1474
    • View Profile
    • My LinkedIn page
Re: Wheat malt...poor extraction
« Reply #7 on: July 08, 2013, 12:02:10 PM »
There is a previous thread on efficiency loss with adjuncts, but I can't find it.

Most replies noted a loss in efficiency when using wheat or rye. I tend to see a 5-7% loss when using a considerable amount of either.

The OP is using wheat malt, not an adjunct.  Anyway, I wonder if folks are seeing the same kind of losses regardless of wheat source (malt, flaked or berries).
Brewers of South Suburbia
Brixie's Brewers
Oak Park Homebrewers

Roger Masson

Improved batch sparge and parti-gyle calculator (v.1.6)

Offline dmtaylor

  • Brewmaster General
  • *******
  • Posts: 2207
  • Two Rivers, WI
    • View Profile
Re: Wheat malt...poor extraction
« Reply #8 on: July 09, 2013, 07:13:52 AM »
I see no loss in efficiency from wheat or rye.  I must be crushing too hard!   ;D
Dave

"This is grain, which any fool can eat, but for which the Lord intended a more divine means of consumption. Let us give praise to our Maker, and glory to His bounty, by learning about... BEER!" - Friar Tuck (Robin Hood - Prince of Thieves)

Online troybinso

  • Brewer
  • ****
  • Posts: 440
    • View Profile
Re: Wheat malt...poor extraction
« Reply #9 on: July 09, 2013, 08:09:12 AM »
Beersmith lists the potential for white wheat malt as 1.040 pppg. This is about 10% higher than the potential for the other base malts (1.035-1.037). I am not sure if wheat malt really has a higher extract potential, but it seems like that could be the problem.

Offline narvin

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1940
  • Baltimore
    • View Profile
Re: Wheat malt...poor extraction
« Reply #10 on: July 09, 2013, 08:11:18 AM »
The ProMash estimate for German wheat malt is 1.039 ppg.   Looking at some of the lot analysis for Best Malz wheat on the Country Malt site (http://www.countrymaltgroup.com/maltlot.asp, enter BZW and you'll get a list), the average is only around 1.037.
Please do not reply if your[sic] an evil alien!
Thanks