Author Topic: Is a New False Bottom Necessary?  (Read 585 times)

Offline harbicide

  • Cellarman
  • **
  • Posts: 83
  • Barkeeper's Friend will not passivate stainless.
    • View Profile
Is a New False Bottom Necessary?
« on: June 23, 2013, 02:42:42 AM »
I brew with a Sankey mash tun with a false bottom that sits on the transition from the side to bottom.  This results in about 2 gallon beneath the FB, but that doesn't bother me since I drain the tun from the bottom. 

My issue is my free FB is 1/8" holes on 3/16" centers.  Because of the rather large holes I lay a piece of aluminum window screen on the FB to minimize grits being carried through. 

I like the idea of a new domed 12" diameter FB that would sit a little lower, but need to be convinced it is worth the $50, or so, that it will cost.  Any idea what the hole size and spacing is on one of them?
On Tap: Barleywine, RIS, Scotch Ale, Wit, Blueberry Wit, Weizen, Dortmunder

Offline klickitat jim

  • I spend way too much time on the AHA forum
  • ********
  • Posts: 2629
    • View Profile
Re: Is a New False Bottom Necessary?
« Reply #1 on: June 23, 2013, 02:53:10 AM »
mine is 3/32 on 5/32 center and works great. I crush pretty fine too. Usually takes about a quart vorlauf to set the bed and get clear runnings
« Last Edit: June 23, 2013, 02:55:06 AM by klickitat jim »

Offline tschmidlin

  • I must live here
  • **********
  • Posts: 8130
  • Redmond, WA
    • View Profile
Re: Is a New False Bottom Necessary?
« Reply #2 on: June 23, 2013, 09:24:10 AM »
Mine is 3/32 too, and works well.

I don't think you need a new false bottom, or the screen you are adding.  Recirculating a bit to clear is normal, and the false bottom should be more about holding up the grain bed than acting as a filter - the grain husks are there for filtering.
Tom Schmidlin