Author Topic: Another Beer Name Lawsuit - this one Utter BS  (Read 1040 times)

Offline majorvices

  • Global Moderator
  • Official Poobah of No Life.
  • *****
  • Posts: 6306
  • Polka. If its too loud you're too young.
    • View Profile
    • Yellowhammer Brewing Company
Keith Y.
Self appointed "All Grain" section pruner

Offline MDixon

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1008
    • View Profile
    • Mike's Homebrewing Page
Re: Another Beer Name Lawsuit - this one Utter BS
« Reply #1 on: September 11, 2013, 04:50:52 AM »
I thought the last one was BS, but others didn't.





In this case, I can at least see the similarity between the can image and the movie image.
It's not a popularity contest, it's beer!

Offline redbeerman

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1713
  • On the banks of the mighty Susquehanna
    • View Profile
Re: Another Beer Name Lawsuit - this one Utter BS
« Reply #2 on: September 11, 2013, 04:53:29 AM »
They may have a case here, mostly due to the image/name combination other than the name alone.
CH3CH2OH - Without it, life itself would be impossible.

[441, 112.1deg] AR

Jim

Offline reverseapachemaster

  • Brewmaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 909
    • View Profile
    • Brain Sparging on Brewing
Re: Another Beer Name Lawsuit - this one Utter BS
« Reply #3 on: September 11, 2013, 07:43:44 AM »
I don't think the brewery can even make a serious argument that they weren't ripping off Mecha Godzilla for that.
Heck yeah I blog about homebrewing: Brain Sparging on Brewing but I'm also a lawyer: The Kielich Law Firm

Offline mtnrockhopper

  • I spend way too much time on the AHA forum
  • ********
  • Posts: 2878
  • Delaware
    • View Profile
Re: Another Beer Name Lawsuit - this one Utter BS
« Reply #4 on: September 11, 2013, 08:14:08 AM »
Yeah, NOLA is clearly trying to benefit from the Godzilla name. He says he never heard of Toho, which means he never researched the trademark. Toho owns both Godzilla and MechaGodzilla. It's kind of a parody though - and an awesome one too. I wonder if it would qualify as fair use - probably expensive to find out.
Jimmy K

Delmarva United Homebrewers - President by inverse coup when the old president ousted himself.
AHA Member since 2006
BJCP: B0958

Offline erockrph

  • Brewmaster General
  • *******
  • Posts: 2414
  • Chepachet, RI
    • View Profile
    • Critical Tastings
Re: Another Beer Name Lawsuit - this one Utter BS
« Reply #5 on: September 11, 2013, 09:00:04 AM »
Looks like Mothra Marzen and Rodan Bock might not be coming out any time soon.

If MechaGojira was shooting a spray of hops out of his mouth then maybe they could play up the parody angle...
Eric B.

Finally got around to starting a homebrewing blog: The Hop Whisperer

Offline klickitat jim

  • I spend way too much time on the AHA forum
  • ********
  • Posts: 2629
    • View Profile
Re: Another Beer Name Lawsuit - this one Utter BS
« Reply #6 on: September 11, 2013, 02:17:53 PM »
But Hoptimus Prime? No problem


Offline majorvices

  • Global Moderator
  • Official Poobah of No Life.
  • *****
  • Posts: 6306
  • Polka. If its too loud you're too young.
    • View Profile
    • Yellowhammer Brewing Company
Re: Another Beer Name Lawsuit - this one Utter BS
« Reply #7 on: September 11, 2013, 05:23:44 PM »
You guys are missing the point. It's a parody. Parodies are allowed and defensible in court. The other logo was a blatant rip off.
Keith Y.
Self appointed "All Grain" section pruner

Offline klickitat jim

  • I spend way too much time on the AHA forum
  • ********
  • Posts: 2629
    • View Profile
Re: Another Beer Name Lawsuit - this one Utter BS
« Reply #8 on: September 11, 2013, 05:40:36 PM »
Ah, got it.

Offline MDixon

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1008
    • View Profile
    • Mike's Homebrewing Page
Re: Another Beer Name Lawsuit - this one Utter BS
« Reply #9 on: September 12, 2013, 05:11:43 AM »
The other logo was a blatant rip off.

We will just have to agree to disagree. I never saw it that way and never would. I'd hang a jury. ;)
It's not a popularity contest, it's beer!

Offline narvin

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1232
  • Baltimore
    • View Profile
Re: Another Beer Name Lawsuit - this one Utter BS
« Reply #10 on: September 12, 2013, 05:29:03 AM »
I don't know if fair use parody would apply when it's for-profit advertising for a product.  Ten seconds on wikipedia, which is about the extent of my legal background, found this:

"In Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music Inc[22] the Supreme Court recognized parody as a potential fair use, even when done for profit. Roy Orbison's publisher, Acuff-Rose Music Inc, had sued 2 Live Crew in 1989 for their use of Orbison's "Oh, Pretty Woman" in a mocking rap version with altered lyrics. The Supreme Court viewed 2 Live Crew's version as a ridiculing commentary on the earlier work, and ruled that when the parody was itself the product rather than used for mere advertising, commercial sale did not bar the defense."
Please do not reply if your an evil alien!
Thanks
Chris S.

Offline klickitat jim

  • I spend way too much time on the AHA forum
  • ********
  • Posts: 2629
    • View Profile
Re: Another Beer Name Lawsuit - this one Utter BS
« Reply #11 on: September 12, 2013, 07:57:48 AM »
So applied to this... are they selling parody, or selling beer?

Offline majorvices

  • Global Moderator
  • Official Poobah of No Life.
  • *****
  • Posts: 6306
  • Polka. If its too loud you're too young.
    • View Profile
    • Yellowhammer Brewing Company
Re: Another Beer Name Lawsuit - this one Utter BS
« Reply #12 on: September 12, 2013, 09:04:46 AM »
Well, you are running the risk for litigation anytime you use incorporate other intellectual property into your own profit making scheme. That's for certain. Where it gets murky is where its a parody or not. If a judge looks at your design and thinks they are close enough to be mistaken, then you are in trouble. In this case, no judge is going to think that the Japanese movie firm is sponsoring or manufacturing this beer. It gets a little trickier if you are profiting from another's intellectual property. Obviously you can't use Lucas characters in any of your branding without getting in a s***world of hurt, so maybe I'm wrong about that.
Keith Y.
Self appointed "All Grain" section pruner

Offline Jarhno

  • Cellarman
  • **
  • Posts: 33
  • You can call me John. (Portland, OR.)
    • View Profile
Re: Another Beer Name Lawsuit - this one Utter BS
« Reply #13 on: September 12, 2013, 09:58:19 AM »
I don't know if fair use parody would apply when it's for-profit advertising for a product.  Ten seconds on wikipedia, which is about the extent of my legal background, found this:

"In Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music Inc[22] the Supreme Court recognized parody as a potential fair use, even when done for profit. Roy Orbison's publisher, Acuff-Rose Music Inc, had sued 2 Live Crew in 1989 for their use of Orbison's "Oh, Pretty Woman" in a mocking rap version with altered lyrics. The Supreme Court viewed 2 Live Crew's version as a ridiculing commentary on the earlier work, and ruled that when the parody was itself the product rather than used for mere advertising, commercial sale did not bar the defense."

That's the most efficient use of 10 seconds on wikipedia I've ever seen. I get trapped on that website for hours.
You can't be a real country unless you have a beer and an airline - it helps if you have some kind of a football team, or some nuclear weapons, but at the very least you need a beer.  - Frank Zappa