Author Topic: SNPA grain bill  (Read 381 times)

Offline redzim

  • Brewer
  • ****
  • Posts: 264
    • View Profile
SNPA grain bill
« on: January 23, 2014, 12:42:05 PM »
I'm sure this is covered in approx 1,000 other threads but I just need some quick reinforcement: my SNPA-like pale ale, which I've brewed unchanged for about 6 batches over 3 years, suddenly tastes too caramelly compared to the real thing.  I do 93% pale ale malt and 7% caramel 60.  should I drop that to caramel 40? or what do you guys do?

also for hops, I do about 25 IBUs of Magnum at 60min, 10 IBUs of Centennial at 30, 8 IBUs of Cascade at 10min, and about double that amount of Cascade at flame-out. Sound good? I know SN uses Perle instead of Centennial but I don't use Perle in any other beer I make so I've subbed Cent in. Would any hops from the following I stock be better: Tettnang, Willamette, Columbus, or Hallertau?

-red

Online goschman

  • Brewmaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 613
    • View Profile
Re: SNPA grain bill
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2014, 01:08:58 PM »
I see Hallertau listed as a possible sub for Perle although the AA% is probably much lower. I think that would work much better than the Centennial

Offline hopfenundmalz

  • Official Poobah of No Life.
  • *
  • Posts: 4530
  • Milford, MI
    • View Profile
Re: SNPA grain bill
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2014, 01:15:22 PM »
They use NA pale malt, and a British C60. Magnum, Perle, finish with Cascade. 38 IBUs.
Jeff Rankert
Ann Arbor Brewers Guild, AHA Member, BJCP Certified
Home-brewing, not just a hobby, it is a lifestyle!

Online morticaixavier

  • Official Poobah of No Life.
  • *
  • Posts: 5672
  • Davis, CA
    • View Profile
    • The Best Artist in the WORLD!!!!!
Re: SNPA grain bill
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2014, 01:28:20 PM »
If it's been good until now I would look either at differences in the crop of hops you are using or seasonal changes in your water. or for that matter it could be changes in Sierra Nevada's water or hops. I don't think I'd go making many changes to a malt bill you've been happy with.
"Creativity is the residue of wasted time" - A. Einstein

Jonathan I Fuller

Offline reverseapachemaster

  • Brewmaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 909
    • View Profile
    • Brain Sparging on Brewing
Re: SNPA grain bill
« Reply #4 on: January 24, 2014, 08:24:07 AM »
I'd also look at how your water may be affecting the malt profile. Any chance your LHBS has changed suppliers? Maybe they are selling you a different crystal malt.

I am pretty sure SN monitors their water carefully and adjusts it frequently.
Heck yeah I blog about homebrewing: Brain Sparging on Brewing but I'm also a lawyer: The Kielich Law Firm

Offline realbeerguy

  • Assistant Brewer
  • ***
  • Posts: 243
  • Golf & drink beer with your friends
    • View Profile
Re: SNPA grain bill
« Reply #5 on: January 24, 2014, 08:49:51 AM »
93/7 @ 156dF is right.  Variation in hop crop from year to year, storage time & method will affect IBU.  I always recalculate recipe on Beersmith re-entering AA & factor for storage.
Member Savannah Brewers League & Lowcountry MALTS

Bluffton SC

Offline denny

  • Administrator
  • I must live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 11654
  • Noti OR [1991.4, 287.6deg] AR
    • View Profile
    • Dennybrew
Re: SNPA grain bill
« Reply #6 on: January 24, 2014, 09:08:13 AM »
If it's been good until now I would look either at differences in the crop of hops you are using or seasonal changes in your water. or for that matter it could be changes in Sierra Nevada's water or hops. I don't think I'd go making many changes to a malt bill you've been happy with.

SN's water doesn't change.  It's filtered and treated the same way every time.
Life begins at 60.....1.060, that is!

www.dennybrew.com

The best, sharpest, funniest, weirdest and most knowledgable minds in home brewing contribute on the AHA forum. - Alewyfe

Online morticaixavier

  • Official Poobah of No Life.
  • *
  • Posts: 5672
  • Davis, CA
    • View Profile
    • The Best Artist in the WORLD!!!!!
Re: SNPA grain bill
« Reply #7 on: January 24, 2014, 09:37:58 AM »
If it's been good until now I would look either at differences in the crop of hops you are using or seasonal changes in your water. or for that matter it could be changes in Sierra Nevada's water or hops. I don't think I'd go making many changes to a malt bill you've been happy with.

SN's water doesn't change.  It's filtered and treated the same way every time.

Didn't you say at one point that they have an RO system but don't use it? the water situation here in northern California is so bad right now anyone on regular water is going to be seeing some changes I would think. I'm sure Sierra Nevada is very careful with their water treatment and get it as close as possible to consistent batch to batch but there must be some variation, at least in the input water.

If the difference he's seeing is on the SN side I imagine it's more likely the hops than the water because the water is so much easier to control but my point was more that it is likely a variation in some ingredient  other than the malt that's causing the change the OP is seeing.
"Creativity is the residue of wasted time" - A. Einstein

Jonathan I Fuller

Offline redzim

  • Brewer
  • ****
  • Posts: 264
    • View Profile
Re: SNPA grain bill
« Reply #8 on: January 24, 2014, 09:41:35 AM »
Thanks for the various ideas.  I'm not too concerned about it, but it was just interesting looking back at my notes, because my 2 previous batches in 2013 were pretty much spot on matches to SNPA, and this one was not. A perfectly fine beer though.  I've always used Briess C-60 but the base malt has been a big variable (Canada, Rahr, Briess, etc.)

red

Offline davidgzach

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1498
    • View Profile
Re: SNPA grain bill
« Reply #9 on: January 24, 2014, 03:10:50 PM »
Hey Red.  I would double check your IBUs.  Everything else looks good.

Dave
Dave Zach