Membership questions? Log in issues? Email info@brewersassociation.org

Author Topic: Rye Water Adsorption  (Read 2525 times)

Offline rapurcell85

  • Cellarman
  • **
  • Posts: 30
Rye Water Adsorption
« on: February 17, 2014, 10:13:40 am »
I brewed a Rye IPA yesterday with about 40% rye malt, 5% cararye, and 55% 2 row malt. I used my normal calculations for sparge water to get my target pre boil volume, but came up a good bit short. I was aiming for 8 gallons, but only got about 7.4 gallons. My efficiency was also a little low, which I expected with the amount at rye I used. The only water loss I can come up with is that the rye adsorbs more water then barley does. There was no extra liquid in the mash tun when I emptied it, and I had no issues with a stuck sparge (I batch sparge in a 10 gallon igloo cooler). Has anyone else seen higher water adsorption with rye?

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk


Offline bluesman

  • I must live here
  • **********
  • Posts: 8825
  • Delaware
Re: Rye Water Adsorption
« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2014, 10:35:09 am »
Since Rye and Wheat have no husk, they tend to absorb more water per unit mass than typical barley malt. I've seen numbers like 12.5% water absorption for malted barley and 20% for rye and wheat malt. Basically about 2 gallons of water loss for every 10lb of rye. YMMV
Ron Price

Offline denny

  • Administrator
  • Retired with too much time on my hands
  • *****
  • Posts: 27093
  • Noti OR [1991.4, 287.6deg] AR
    • Dennybrew
Re: Rye Water Adsorption
« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2014, 10:35:19 am »
Nope, exactly the same rye or not.
Life begins at 60.....1.060, that is!

www.dennybrew.com

The best, sharpest, funniest, weirdest and most knowledgable minds in home brewing contribute on the AHA forum. - Alewyfe

"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell

Offline denny

  • Administrator
  • Retired with too much time on my hands
  • *****
  • Posts: 27093
  • Noti OR [1991.4, 287.6deg] AR
    • Dennybrew
Re: Rye Water Adsorption
« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2014, 10:36:04 am »
Since Rye and Wheat have no husk, they tend to absorb more water per unit mass than typical barley malt. I've seen numbers like 12.5% water absorption for malted barley and 20% for rye and wheat malt. Basically about 2 gallons of water loss for every 10lb of rye.

Really?  As you know, I've brewed a few rye beers.  I've never seen that happen.
Life begins at 60.....1.060, that is!

www.dennybrew.com

The best, sharpest, funniest, weirdest and most knowledgable minds in home brewing contribute on the AHA forum. - Alewyfe

"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell

Offline bluesman

  • I must live here
  • **********
  • Posts: 8825
  • Delaware
Re: Rye Water Adsorption
« Reply #4 on: February 17, 2014, 10:38:14 am »
Since Rye and Wheat have no husk, they tend to absorb more water per unit mass than typical barley malt. I've seen numbers like 12.5% water absorption for malted barley and 20% for rye and wheat malt. Basically about 2 gallons of water loss for every 10lb of rye.

Really?  As you know, I've brewed a few rye beers.  I've never seen that happen.

I don't have any scientific data to support this, but this has been my experience and that of some others as well. Again YMMV.
Ron Price

Offline duboman

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1578
Re: Rye Water Adsorption
« Reply #5 on: February 17, 2014, 10:44:30 am »
Since I brew Denny's RyePA at least 3-4x per year I can say I haven't seen a difference in absorption either, are you sure you measured your sparge volume properly?
Peace....Love......Beer......

The Commune Brewing Company-Perfecting the craft of beer since 2010

Offline oly

  • Cellarman
  • **
  • Posts: 68
  • beervana
Re: Rye Water Adsorption
« Reply #6 on: February 17, 2014, 11:00:04 am »
rapurcell85, my recent experience is like yours. I brewed a 60% rye roggenbier a few weeks ago and came up about 1/2-3/4 gal short (7 gal recipe).  I also attributed it to rye absorption as there were no other differences in my process. I batch sparge.

On the other hand, when I brew Rye IPA with closer to 15-20% rye, I don't notice a volume difference, but perhaps at that lower precentage the volume difference is in the noise.

Offline kramerog

  • Brewmaster General
  • *******
  • Posts: 2262
    • My LinkedIn page
Re: Rye Water Adsorption
« Reply #7 on: February 17, 2014, 11:20:06 am »
No specific experience with rye here, but perhaps you used rice hulls which would reduce yield some.

Offline erockrph

  • I must live here
  • **********
  • Posts: 7788
  • Chepachet, RI
    • The Hop WHisperer
Re: Rye Water Adsorption
« Reply #8 on: February 17, 2014, 11:43:08 am »
What's your mash thickness? Maybe with thicker mashes the beta glucans from the rye are enough to gum up the works a bit, but with a thinner mash it's able to flow a bit more freely? Just a WAG here, no experience to back this up...
Eric B.

Finally got around to starting a homebrewing blog: The Hop Whisperer

Offline rapurcell85

  • Cellarman
  • **
  • Posts: 30
Re: Rye Water Adsorption
« Reply #9 on: February 18, 2014, 09:57:29 am »
I did not use rice hulls. I don't tend to have problems with batch sparging up to at least 50% wheat, so I assumed I wouldn't need them for rye, and didn't have any issues with a stuck sparge. I believe I had around 1.5 quarts per pound for my mash thickness. My notes are not with me, so I can't say for certain. It may have been a little thinner than that, say 1.7 quarts per pound. I haven't brewed a wheat beer in a while, but I don't recall having the same issue. I'm also fairly certain I had the volumes correct, but can't say for sure.

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk


Offline amh0001

  • Cellarman
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: Rye Water Adsorption
« Reply #10 on: February 18, 2014, 10:14:35 am »
I use Brew in a Bag, and I find if I use wheat my grain absorption is less because of no husks. My normal rate is .07 gallons per pound of grain. If half my grist is wheat the the absorption is more like .03.

This means I come out with more liquid not less. I am actually brewing with rye for the first time today. Well see if its the same.