update from yesterday on the Kansas bill (which passed the House in February and 40-0 in the Senate last month, but with amendments.)
**********************************************************************
"Earlier today, the House met and just before noon here's what happened to our bill: Sub for HB 2223 - Alcoholic beverages; relating to homemade fermented beverages. The House Nonconcurred; Conference Committee requested; the House appointed Brunk, Couture-Lovelady and Ruiz. No meeting announced yet (Senate has to appoint conferees).
The plan is for the House to concur tomorrow before a conference committee meets."
********************************************************************
OK, so I know we've got some legal experts, so I've just got to ask: What am I not getting?
As I understand it the Committee is a safety measure, but if the plan is to concur before they ever meet, what is the point? Wouldn't it be easier to, you know, concur the first time?!?