Membership questions? Log in issues? Email info@brewersassociation.org

Author Topic: Suggestions for wild yeast  (Read 5080 times)

S. cerevisiae

  • Guest
Re: Suggestions for wild yeast
« Reply #15 on: September 29, 2014, 07:54:43 pm »
{P}henolic {O}ff {F}lavor… very few POF+ yeasts are used in brewing but a number of wine yeasts are POF+.

Actually, quite a few brewing strains are POF+.  In fact, as I mentioned above, many British strains POF+ to some extent.  True POF- strains do not throw phenolic flavors when fermented really warm.  Lager strains are generally never POF+.  They just throw other types of trash when fermented warm.

Offline pete b

  • Official Poobah of No Life. (I Got Ban Hammered by Drew)
  • *********
  • Posts: 4150
  • Barre, Ma
Re: Suggestions for wild yeast
« Reply #16 on: September 29, 2014, 08:27:55 pm »
Are cold tolerant strains less preferable?

No, but cold tolerant strains tend to be Saccharomyces bayanus (S. bayanus), not Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae).  Champagne yeast strains belong to the S. bayanus species (EC 1118 is good down to 45F).  Lager yeast (Saccharomyces pastorianus) is now believed to be the result of a hybridization event between S. cerevisiae and a Patagonian yeast species known as Saccharomyces ebayanus.


Quote
What is POF
  • ?
Phenolic Off-Flavor Positive

Hefeweizen strains are POF+. Belgian strains tend to be POF+.  There are many English strains that are POF+.   I am sensitive to phenols; therefore, I am not a fan of POF+ strains.
Got it. I like most of those strains in the right context but am all to familiar with them appearing in the wrong place in too warm fermentations. I'm sorry but not surprised that ebay now has their own yeast strain.
Don't let the bastards cheer you up.

Offline erockrph

  • I must live here
  • **********
  • Posts: 7793
  • Chepachet, RI
    • The Hop WHisperer
Re: Suggestions for wild yeast
« Reply #17 on: September 30, 2014, 09:10:37 am »
  Lager yeast (Saccharomyces pastorianus) is now believed to be the result of a hybridization event between S. cerevisiae and a Patagonian yeast species known as Saccharomyces ebayanus.
Got it. I like most of those strains in the right context but am all to familiar with them appearing in the wrong place in too warm fermentations. I'm sorry but not surprised that ebay now has their own yeast strain.
;D

It's actually a typo. The species is S. eubayanus. And recent research suggests that it may be of Tibetan origin, rather than Patagonian:

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982214004692
Eric B.

Finally got around to starting a homebrewing blog: The Hop Whisperer

Offline pete b

  • Official Poobah of No Life. (I Got Ban Hammered by Drew)
  • *********
  • Posts: 4150
  • Barre, Ma
Re: Suggestions for wild yeast
« Reply #18 on: September 30, 2014, 09:16:40 am »
  Lager yeast (Saccharomyces pastorianus) is now believed to be the result of a hybridization event between S. cerevisiae and a Patagonian yeast species known as Saccharomyces ebayanus.
Got it. I like most of those strains in the right context but am all to familiar with them appearing in the wrong place in too warm fermentations. I'm sorry but not surprised that ebay now has their own yeast strain.
;D

It's actually a typo. The species is S. eubayanus. And recent research suggests that it may be of Tibetan origin, rather than Patagonian:

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982214004692
Tibetan yeast. Cool. Someone should name a beer made with it "the Dali Lager". (where I live in Massachusetts "lager" and "Lama" almost rhyme: "Dali Laahga")
Don't let the bastards cheer you up.

Offline anthony

  • Brewer
  • ****
  • Posts: 263
  • Hoppy to help!
    • Triptych
Re: Suggestions for wild yeast
« Reply #19 on: September 30, 2014, 10:25:09 am »
{P}henolic {O}ff {F}lavor… very few POF+ yeasts are used in brewing but a number of wine yeasts are POF+.

Actually, quite a few brewing strains are POF+.  In fact, as I mentioned above, many British strains POF+ to some extent.  True POF- strains do not throw phenolic flavors when fermented really warm.  Lager strains are generally never POF+.  They just throw other types of trash when fermented warm.

There are a number of yeast strains, isolated from breweries, that are POF+. I stand by my original comment that in modern breweries, the vast majority of yeasts in use are, in fact, not POF+.

Offline erockrph

  • I must live here
  • **********
  • Posts: 7793
  • Chepachet, RI
    • The Hop WHisperer
Re: Suggestions for wild yeast
« Reply #20 on: September 30, 2014, 10:58:38 am »
{P}henolic {O}ff {F}lavor… very few POF+ yeasts are used in brewing but a number of wine yeasts are POF+.

Actually, quite a few brewing strains are POF+.  In fact, as I mentioned above, many British strains POF+ to some extent.  True POF- strains do not throw phenolic flavors when fermented really warm.  Lager strains are generally never POF+.  They just throw other types of trash when fermented warm.

There are a number of yeast strains, isolated from breweries, that are POF+. I stand by my original comment that in modern breweries, the vast majority of yeasts in use are, in fact, not POF+.
That's because the vast majority either use Chico or a lager strain...
Eric B.

Finally got around to starting a homebrewing blog: The Hop Whisperer

Offline klickitat jim

  • I must live here
  • **********
  • Posts: 8604
Re: Suggestions for wild yeast
« Reply #21 on: September 30, 2014, 02:49:42 pm »
This thread shows how gullible I can be.  I actually thought ebay had yeast now

Offline brewinhard

  • Official Poobah of No Life. (I Got Ban Hammered by Drew)
  • *********
  • Posts: 3272
Re: Suggestions for wild yeast
« Reply #22 on: September 30, 2014, 05:05:38 pm »
This thread shows how gullible I can be.  I actually thought ebay had yeast now

I could totally see you searching for it as well.  Heh, heh..... ;D

Offline klickitat jim

  • I must live here
  • **********
  • Posts: 8604
Re: Suggestions for wild yeast
« Reply #23 on: September 30, 2014, 05:44:10 pm »
This thread shows how gullible I can be.  I actually thought ebay had yeast now

I could totally see you searching for it as well.  Heh, heh..... ;D

Crossed my mind briefly, but I trust what is posted here.

S. cerevisiae

  • Guest
Re: Suggestions for wild yeast
« Reply #24 on: September 30, 2014, 08:53:39 pm »
While there are ale strains that are completely POF-, a large proper subset of the ale strains that are currently in production use worldwide are POF+ to some extent.   The ale strains that are available to American amateur and professional craft brewers are a very tiny fraction of the ale strains that are in use worldwide.  Alan Pugsley has mentioned many times that Ringwood is considered to be a neutral yeast culture in the UK.   My experience with  strains imported directly from the UK correlates with his claim.

Let's examine the strains that are available from Brewlab in the UK.

Brewlab 1500 Thames Valley 1 (allegedly the Courage strain) is POF-  (http://www.brewlab.co.uk/pdf/yeast_1.pdf)

Brewlab 1508 Thames Valley 2 is POF- (www.brewlab.co.uk/pdf/yeast_2.pdf)

Brewlab 1000 Thames Valley 3 (Fuller's) is POF- (www.brewlab.co.uk/pdf/yeast_3.pdf)

Brewlab Sussex 1 (Harvey's) is POF+  (www.brewlab.co.uk/pdf/yeast_4.pdf)

Brewlab East Midlands 1 (Bateman's) is POF- (http://www.brewlab.co.uk/pdf/yeast_5.pdf)

Brewlab Burton 1 (Marston's) is POF+ (http://www.brewlab.co.uk/pdf/yeast_6.pdf)

Brewlab Devon is POF+ (http://www.brewlab.co.uk/pdf/yeast_7.pdf)

Brewlab Kent (Shepard Neame) is POF+ (http://www.brewlab.co.uk/pdf/yeast_8.pdf)

Brewlab Yorkshire (Black Sheep) is POF+ (http://www.brewlab.co.uk/pdf/yeast_9.pdf)

Brewlab Lancashire (Thwaites) is POF+ (http://www.brewlab.co.uk/pdf/yeast_10.pdf)

Brewlab Tyneside is POF+ (http://www.brewlab.co.uk/pdf/yeast_11.pdf)

Brewlab Scottish Borders (McKewen's) is POF- (http://www.brewlab.co.uk/pdf/yeast_12.pdf)

Hence, seven out of the twelve most popular yeast strains in Brewlab's bank are POF+ to some extent, and we have not even touched the more funky strains in their bank. 
« Last Edit: October 01, 2014, 08:40:13 am by S. cerevisiae »