Membership questions? Log in issues? Email info@brewersassociation.org

Author Topic: Starter for Strong ale  (Read 1897 times)

Offline Pi

  • Brewer
  • ****
  • Posts: 429
  • "I would never trade tomorrow for today"
Starter for Strong ale
« on: November 10, 2014, 09:43:16 am »
Doing a Dark Belgian Ale using WLP540 or Wyeast 1762. OG will be like 1.011. So I was gonna start with 1.5l. of 1.030, cold crash, decant and add another 1.5l. of 1.030.
Is this a better method than just doing one 3l. of 1.030?
Primary:On Reflection APA
Lagering: Vienna
Drinking: Whenever I'm not working or driving

Offline morticaixavier

  • I must live here
  • **********
  • Posts: 7781
  • Underhill VT
    • The Best Artist in the WORLD!!!!!
Re: Starter for Strong ale
« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2014, 09:45:45 am »
If you can I would do the single step 3 liter. a given volume of wort will only grow a certain amount of yeast. adding that same amount of yeast to the same amount of wort again won't result in significant additional growth.

If I recall a 1 liter starter will max out at about 200 billion cells
"Creativity is the residue of wasted time"
-A Einstein

"errors are [...] the portals of discovery"
- J Joyce

Offline erockrph

  • I must live here
  • **********
  • Posts: 7792
  • Chepachet, RI
    • The Hop WHisperer
Re: Starter for Strong ale
« Reply #2 on: November 10, 2014, 09:55:18 am »
If you can I would do the single step 3 liter. a given volume of wort amount of extract will only grow a certain amount of yeast. adding that same amount of yeast to the same amount of wort again won't result in significant additional growth.

If I recall a 1 liter starter will max out at about 200 billion cells
Slight correction there.

There has been some discussion here as of late suggesting that stepping up the gravity on your starters may help acclimate your yeast to higher gravity wort.

If you went the stepped starter route, I'd make your second step maybe around 1.050 instead of 1.030. You will get some yeast growth, since there is more extract (sugar) present than the previous step, even though it is the same volume. I'd pitch this step at high krausen if at all possible.
Eric B.

Finally got around to starting a homebrewing blog: The Hop Whisperer

Offline morticaixavier

  • I must live here
  • **********
  • Posts: 7781
  • Underhill VT
    • The Best Artist in the WORLD!!!!!
Re: Starter for Strong ale
« Reply #3 on: November 10, 2014, 09:59:20 am »
If you can I would do the single step 3 liter. a given volume of wort amount of extract will only grow a certain amount of yeast. adding that same amount of yeast to the same amount of wort again won't result in significant additional growth.

If I recall a 1 liter starter will max out at about 200 billion cells
Slight correction there.

There has been some discussion here as of late suggesting that stepping up the gravity on your starters may help acclimate your yeast to higher gravity wort.

If you went the stepped starter route, I'd make your second step maybe around 1.050 instead of 1.030. You will get some yeast growth, since there is more extract (sugar) present than the previous step, even though it is the same volume. I'd pitch this step at high krausen if at all possible.

good point
"Creativity is the residue of wasted time"
-A Einstein

"errors are [...] the portals of discovery"
- J Joyce

Offline Jimmy K

  • Official Poobah of No Life. (I Got Ban Hammered by Drew)
  • *********
  • Posts: 3643
  • Delaware
Re: Starter for Strong ale
« Reply #4 on: November 10, 2014, 11:48:30 am »
You won't get much out of the 2nd step because the cell density will be pretty high to begin. For the stepped starters in Yeast, each step is several times larger than the last - like 5 or more times larger.
 
The Brewers' Friend calculator shows no difference between one 3L and a two-step 1.5L starter. (Actually, the two step calculates fewer cells at the end.)
« Last Edit: November 10, 2014, 11:50:29 am by Jimmy K »
Delmarva United Homebrewers - President by inverse coup - former president ousted himself.
AHA Member since 2006
BJCP Certified: B0958

Offline denny

  • Administrator
  • Retired with too much time on my hands
  • *****
  • Posts: 27129
  • Noti OR [1991.4, 287.6deg] AR
    • Dennybrew
Re: Starter for Strong ale
« Reply #5 on: November 10, 2014, 12:48:34 pm »
There has been some discussion here as of late suggesting that stepping up the gravity on your starters may help acclimate your yeast to higher gravity wort.

Or it may not.  IME, it's unnecessary.
Life begins at 60.....1.060, that is!

www.dennybrew.com

The best, sharpest, funniest, weirdest and most knowledgable minds in home brewing contribute on the AHA forum. - Alewyfe

"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell

Offline brewinhard

  • Official Poobah of No Life. (I Got Ban Hammered by Drew)
  • *********
  • Posts: 3272
Re: Starter for Strong ale
« Reply #6 on: November 10, 2014, 02:33:52 pm »
Doing a Dark Belgian Ale using WLP540 or Wyeast 1762. OG will be like 1.011.

Wow!  A 1.011 OG!  I think you could ferment that with 20 yeast cells..... ;D

Offline erockrph

  • I must live here
  • **********
  • Posts: 7792
  • Chepachet, RI
    • The Hop WHisperer
Re: Starter for Strong ale
« Reply #7 on: November 10, 2014, 09:01:01 pm »
There has been some discussion here as of late suggesting that stepping up the gravity on your starters may help acclimate your yeast to higher gravity wort.
Or it may not.  IME, it's unnecessary.
I agree that it's not necessary. I've had plenty of big beers ferment out perfectly well using a single starter of normal gravity. But I do feel that repitches from a 1.050-1.060ish batch tend to perform a bit better than a single-step starter.

If you're going to do a starter in two steps of the same volume, using a higher gravity the second time will net you some additional growth. It may not guarantee you a better beer, but I don't see a reason why not to make the second step a bit higher gravity than the first one.
Eric B.

Finally got around to starting a homebrewing blog: The Hop Whisperer