Membership questions? Log in issues? Email info@brewersassociation.org

Author Topic: Strike Temp.  (Read 3942 times)

Offline dcb

  • Assistant Brewer
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
  • Num, me vexo?
Re: Strike Temp.
« Reply #15 on: February 07, 2015, 09:59:13 pm »
Latent heat of fusion is covered in the "Heat transfer and refrigeration" chapter of "Brewing" by Lewis and Young.

Somehow, I had not heard of this book.  Amazon says it's on its way.  Thanks!

S. cerevisiae

  • Guest
Re: Strike Temp.
« Reply #16 on: February 08, 2015, 08:43:38 am »
Somehow, I had not heard of this book.  Amazon says it's on its way.  Thanks!

You're welcome.  It's one of my favorite brewing textbooks.  While not for the beginning brewer, one can tell that the authors are experienced teachers as well as experienced researchers. 

Offline Lazy Ant Brewing

  • Brewmaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 634
Re: Strike Temp.
« Reply #17 on: February 08, 2015, 09:07:07 am »
I do BIAB and find that I just need to heat the water to the recommended mash temp.  Any more than the prescribed temp and it is too hot.  And I am using a digital thermometer which is presumably fairly accurate.

I'm puzzled that one of the guys  posting above said he needs to go 16 F above to get to the mash temp. Is this because you are adding water slowly into your mash tun?

Thanks
It's easier to read brewing books and get information from the forum than to sacrifice virgins to appease the brewing gods when bad beer happens!

Offline flbrewer

  • Brewmaster General
  • *******
  • Posts: 2161
Re: Strike Temp.
« Reply #18 on: February 08, 2015, 09:58:37 am »
Heated up to 175 (22 degrees higher) than I needed to this morning. Found out quickly that that was way too high. Stirred for about 10 minutes on and off and added a little ice to remedy it. Made some good notes for next time.

Offline denny

  • Administrator
  • Retired with too much time on my hands
  • *****
  • Posts: 27090
  • Noti OR [1991.4, 287.6deg] AR
    • Dennybrew
Re: Strike Temp.
« Reply #19 on: February 08, 2015, 10:04:52 am »
Denny what is the cheap and easy
Hydrometer reading method?

Put about 8 oz. of boiling wort into a metal cocktail shaker.  Swirl it in a bow of water for 45-60 seconds.  It will be down into the mid 60s at that point so you can take a hydrometer reading.
Life begins at 60.....1.060, that is!

www.dennybrew.com

The best, sharpest, funniest, weirdest and most knowledgable minds in home brewing contribute on the AHA forum. - Alewyfe

"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell

S. cerevisiae

  • Guest
Re: Strike Temp.
« Reply #20 on: February 08, 2015, 11:45:21 am »
I'm puzzled that one of the guys  posting above said he needs to go 16 F above to get to the mash temp. Is this because you are adding water slowly into your mash tun?

No, it's because we are raising the temperature of the grain and the tun to mash temperature with the hot liquor infusion, and the hot liquor infusion has to carry this additional heat energy into the tun. This problem is an exercise in applied thermodynamics.  Let's examine the equation that I posted.

strike_liquor_temperature = (0.2 / hot_liquor_to_grist_ratio_in_quarts_per_pound) x (desired_strike_temperature - grist_temperature) + desired_strike_temperature

There's a concept in thermodynamics known as specific heat capacity.  Specific heat capacity is the ratio of the amount of heat energy added to an object to the rise in temperature resulting from the addition of the heat energy.   Twenty pounds of grain has the same amount of heat capacity as 1 gallon of water, that is, the amount of heat energy necessary to raise the temperature of a gallon of water 1 degree is equal to the amount of heat energy required to raise the temperature of 20 pounds of grain 1 degree.

The value 0.2 in the equation shown above represents the specific heat weighting factor for a pound of grain with respect to a quart of water.  If 20 pounds of grain has the same specific heat capacity as a gallon of water, then 1 pound of grain has the specific heat capacity of 1/20th of a gallon of water, which equals 0.05 in decimal.  As there are four quarts in a gallon, we have to multiply this value by 4 to convert it to specific heat capacity with respect to a quart of water, which equals 0.05 * 4 = 0.2.

Now, because we generally mash with a grist ratio of one than one quart per pound of grain, we need to further scale the grain-weighting factor.  We perform this step by dividing 0.2 by the number of quarts per pound that we use during mash-in (i.e., hot_liquor_to_grist_ratio_in_quarts_per_pound in the equation shown above).

In the next part of the equation, we calculate the difference between the strike temperature (our rest temperature) and the grist temperature. The subexpression "(desired_strike_temperature - grist_temperature)" accomplishes that goal. 

Now, we need to convert the temperature difference that we just calculated to specific heat in quarts because one pound of grain only has as much specific heat capacity as 1/5th of a quart of water.  That's where the weighting factor that we previously calculated comes into play.  In the example that I gave earlier in the thread, the temperature difference between the grist before mash-in was 77F.  The desired strike temperature was 151F, resulting in a temperature differential of 74 degrees Fahrenheit.  We are using 1.5 quarts per pound; therefore, the weighting factor 0.2 gets reduced to  0.13.

strike_liquor_temperature = (0.2 / 1.5) * (151 - 77) + 151 =  0.13  *  74 + 151 =  161F (72C)

Hopefully, I have not lost the members of the forum at this point.  The subexpression "0.13 * 74" shown in the equation above represents the amount of heat energy as water necessary to raise the temperature of the grist to 151F.  Every quart of water that we infuse must carry the heat energy necessary to raise a quart of water 10 degrees above the strike temperature because that heat energy will be absorbed by the grist, resulting in the grist temperature rising to 151F.

The next part of the problem is the most difficult to approximate, which is why it is best arrived at empirically.  The tun itself has a specific heat capacity, and it is not sitting at strike temperature when we mash-in; hence, we have to add additional heat energy to cover this thermal loss.  Whereas the amount of heat energy necessary to raise a pound of grain X number of degrees given V volume of strike liquor to a given strike temperature remains linear as long as the ratio of quarts to pounds remains the same, the amount of heat energy required to raise the tun to strike temperature remains static because the tun's mass does not change with respect to mash size.  In effect, the amount of additional heat energy per quart necessary to raise the tun to strike temperature decreases as the volume of the mash increases.

« Last Edit: February 08, 2015, 02:00:49 pm by S. cerevisiae »

Offline HoosierBrew

  • I must live here
  • **********
  • Posts: 13031
  • Indianapolis,IN
Re: Strike Temp.
« Reply #21 on: February 08, 2015, 11:53:22 am »
FWIW, I normally go 13-15 degrees above mash target, depending on time of year ( I keep my cooler in the garage, bring it in the night before).
Jon H.

Offline fmader

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1675
Re: Strike Temp.
« Reply #22 on: February 08, 2015, 12:26:28 pm »
I'm puzzled that one of the guys  posting above said he needs to go 16 F above to get to the mash temp. Is this because you are adding water slowly into your mash tun?

No, it's because we are raising the temperature of the grain and the tun to mash temperature with the hot liquor infusion, and the hot liquor infusion has to carry this additional heat energy into the tun. This problem is an exercise in applied thermodynamics.  Let's examine the equation that I posted.

strike_liquor_temperature = (0.2 / hot_liquor_to_grist_ratio_in_quarts_per_pound) x (desired_strike_temperature - grist_temperature) + desired_strike_temperature

There's a concept in thermodynamics known as specific heat capacity.  Specific heat capacity is the ratio of the amount of heat energy added to an object to the rise in temperature resulting from the addition of the heat energy.   Twenty pounds of grain has the same amount of heat capacity as 1 gallon of water, that is, the amount of heat energy necessary to raise the temperature of a gallon of water 1 degree is equal to the amount of heat energy required to raise the temperature of 20 pounds of grain 1 degree.

The value 0.2 in the equation shown above represents the specific heat waiting factor for a pound of grain with respect to a quart of water.  If 20 pounds of grain has the same specific heat capacity as a gallon of water, then 1 pound of grain has the specific heat capacity of 1/20th of a gallon of water, which equals 0.05 in decimal.  As there are four quarts in a gallon, we have to multiply this value by 4 to convert it to specific heat capacity with respect to a quart of water, which equals 0.05 * 4 = 0.2.

Now, because we generally mash with a grist ratio of one than one quart per pound of grain, we need to further scale the grain-weighting factor.  We perform this step by dividing 0.2 by the number of quarts per pound that we use during mash-in (i.e., hot_liquor_to_grist_ratio_in_quarts_per_pound in the equation shown above).

In the next part of the equation, we calculate the difference between the strike temperature (our rest temperature) and the grist temperature. The subexpression "(desired_strike_temperature - grist_temperature)" accomplishes that goal. 

Now, we need to covert the temperature difference that we just converted to specific heat in quarts because one pound of grain only has as much specific heat capacity as 1/5th of a quart of water.  That's where the weighting factor that we previously calculated comes into play.  In the example that I gave earlier in the thread, the temperature difference between the grist before mash-in was 77F.  The desired strike temperature was 151F, resulting in a temperature differential of 74 degrees Fahrenheit.  We are using 1.5 quarts per pound; therefore, the weighting factor 0.2 gets reduced to  0.13.

strike_liquor_temperature = (0.2 / 1.5) * (151 - 77) + 151 =  0.13  *  74 + 151 =  161F (72C)

Hopefully, I have not lost the members of the forum at this point.  The subexpression "0.13 * 74" shown in the equation above represents the amount of heat necessary to raise the temperature of the grist to 151F.  Every quart of water that we infuse must carry the heat energy necessary to raise a quart of water 10 degrees above the strike temperature because that heat energy will be absorbed by the grist, resulting in the grist temperature rising to 151F.

The next part of the problem is the most difficult to approximate, which is why it is best arrived at empirically.  The tun itself has a specific heat capacity, and it is not sitting at strike temperature when we mash-in; hence, we have to add additional heat energy to cover this thermal loss.  Whereas the amount of heat energy necessary to raise a pound of grain X number of degrees given V volume of strike liquor to a given strike temperature remains linear as long as the ratio of quarts to pounds remains the same, the amount of heat energy required to raise the tun to strike temperature remains static because the tun's mass does not change with respect to mash size.  In effect, the amount of additional heat energy per quart necessary to raise the tun to strike temperature decreases as the volume of the mash increases.

This^^^

I wasn't and still not this scientific when determining my strike temp. It was a trial on error type a deal when I first started my system. It only took a few brews to dial it in close enough. There are several determining factors for me. 18 degrees over was the original baseline. This is usually was when I was mashing at about 1.5 qts/lb. However, I mash much thinner than that now. A lot of the times I'm mashing at 2 qts/lb. I do gravity feed my mash water. This transfer does take about 5 minutes or so. Also, the time of the year plays a factor. I'll keep my tun inside at room temp before I'm ready to mash, but my grain is stored in the basement. Basement temps can get down to 50 degrees in the winter. So, in the winter, my strikes have to be a touch higher to hit my desired target. I also rather be a degree or two high on my target mash temp instead of being a degree or two low. It's much easier to stir for a few minutes or add a few ice cubes to the mix instead of adding a 1/2 gallon or so of boiling water. A lot of my brewing calculations are done by feel and experience. It's what works for me, and I make good beer  ;D.
Frank