Membership questions? Log in issues? Email info@brewersassociation.org

Author Topic: Low FG  (Read 2586 times)

Offline HoosierBrew

  • I must live here
  • **********
  • Posts: 13031
  • Indianapolis,IN
Re: Low FG
« Reply #15 on: May 22, 2015, 05:44:46 am »
it shouldn't be sweet but it should be balanced. That said, you can't draw conclusions from the FG alone about how dry/sweet or more importantly malty/hoppy the beer is going to be. Let this one finish up and condition. If it's too thin or dry to support the hop bitterness than you know you should do what you can to up your FG and add some body next time.

+1
Jon H.

Offline flbrewer

  • Brewmaster General
  • *******
  • Posts: 2161
Re: Low FG
« Reply #16 on: May 22, 2015, 08:07:30 am »

Thanks, must have missed that one.
how could you miss it? I hardly post. Double checked this morning and it's right at 1.000 at 68 degrees.

rabeb25

  • Guest
Re: Low FG
« Reply #17 on: May 22, 2015, 08:36:33 am »
BIAB with a fine crush?

Offline flbrewer

  • Brewmaster General
  • *******
  • Posts: 2161
Re: Low FG
« Reply #18 on: May 22, 2015, 08:45:58 am »

BIAB with a fine crush?
Nope, just batch sparging all grain. I think the crush is good. Will take a closer look.

Offline morticaixavier

  • I must live here
  • **********
  • Posts: 7781
  • Underhill VT
    • The Best Artist in the WORLD!!!!!
Re: Low FG
« Reply #19 on: May 22, 2015, 08:49:24 am »

Thanks, must have missed that one.
how could you miss it? I hardly post. Double checked this morning and it's right at 1.000 at 68 degrees.

is it calibrated for 68? most of them are 60 or 65 I thought.
"Creativity is the residue of wasted time"
-A Einstein

"errors are [...] the portals of discovery"
- J Joyce

Offline flbrewer

  • Brewmaster General
  • *******
  • Posts: 2161
Re: Low FG
« Reply #20 on: May 22, 2015, 08:50:32 am »
Hmmm, not sure. Only saying that bc I saw it on an online calc. Will recheck.

Offline morticaixavier

  • I must live here
  • **********
  • Posts: 7781
  • Underhill VT
    • The Best Artist in the WORLD!!!!!
Re: Low FG
« Reply #21 on: May 22, 2015, 09:35:09 am »
Hmmm, not sure. Only saying that bc I saw it on an online calc. Will recheck.

it should say, either on the paper inside the hydro or on the paper that came with it.
"Creativity is the residue of wasted time"
-A Einstein

"errors are [...] the portals of discovery"
- J Joyce

Offline denny

  • Administrator
  • Retired with too much time on my hands
  • *****
  • Posts: 27121
  • Noti OR [1991.4, 287.6deg] AR
    • Dennybrew
Re: Low FG
« Reply #22 on: May 22, 2015, 09:53:01 am »
I'll give my next batch a higher mash temp. I guess I really don't know if a pale ale should be dry or not, and if it's really an issue either way with the low FG.

Go get a Sierra Nevada pale ale.  Use that as your guide.
Life begins at 60.....1.060, that is!

www.dennybrew.com

The best, sharpest, funniest, weirdest and most knowledgable minds in home brewing contribute on the AHA forum. - Alewyfe

"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell

Offline klickitat jim

  • I must live here
  • **********
  • Posts: 8604
Re: Low FG
« Reply #23 on: May 22, 2015, 10:58:55 am »
I'll give my next batch a higher mash temp. I guess I really don't know if a pale ale should be dry or not, and if it's really an issue either way with the low FG.

Go get a Sierra Nevada pale ale.  Use that as your guide.
Not Oakshire?

Offline brewinhard

  • Official Poobah of No Life. (I Got Ban Hammered by Drew)
  • *********
  • Posts: 3272
Re: Low FG
« Reply #24 on: May 22, 2015, 12:26:57 pm »

Thanks, must have missed that one.
how could you miss it? I hardly post. Double checked this morning and it's right at 1.000 at 68 degrees.

is it calibrated for 68? most of them are 60 or 65 I thought.

Most I have seen are calibrated at 60 or 68 degrees F. 

Offline BrodyR

  • Brewmaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 524
  • Philadelphia, PA
Re: Low FG
« Reply #25 on: May 22, 2015, 12:55:24 pm »
BIAB with a fine crush?

I BIAB with a fine crush and typically get lower FG than beer smith predicts... is that why?

Offline morticaixavier

  • I must live here
  • **********
  • Posts: 7781
  • Underhill VT
    • The Best Artist in the WORLD!!!!!
Re: Low FG
« Reply #26 on: May 22, 2015, 01:47:19 pm »

Thanks, must have missed that one.
how could you miss it? I hardly post. Double checked this morning and it's right at 1.000 at 68 degrees.

is it calibrated for 68? most of them are 60 or 65 I thought.

Most I have seen are calibrated at 60 or 68 degrees F.
That's probably right
"Creativity is the residue of wasted time"
-A Einstein

"errors are [...] the portals of discovery"
- J Joyce

Offline denny

  • Administrator
  • Retired with too much time on my hands
  • *****
  • Posts: 27121
  • Noti OR [1991.4, 287.6deg] AR
    • Dennybrew
Re: Low FG
« Reply #27 on: May 22, 2015, 02:10:41 pm »
I'll give my next batch a higher mash temp. I guess I really don't know if a pale ale should be dry or not, and if it's really an issue either way with the low FG.

Go get a Sierra Nevada pale ale.  Use that as your guide.
Not Oakshire?

Oakshire doesn't really make a straight ahead pale ale.  And SNPA is kinda the benchmark of the style.
Life begins at 60.....1.060, that is!

www.dennybrew.com

The best, sharpest, funniest, weirdest and most knowledgable minds in home brewing contribute on the AHA forum. - Alewyfe

"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell

Offline brewinhard

  • Official Poobah of No Life. (I Got Ban Hammered by Drew)
  • *********
  • Posts: 3272
Re: Low FG
« Reply #28 on: May 23, 2015, 05:14:25 pm »
BIAB with a fine crush?

I BIAB with a fine crush and typically get lower FG than beer smith predicts... is that why?

I would not pay much attention to any program that is predicting a potential FG.  You can look at it as a potential finishing range, but don't take much heed in it.  There are just too many variables involved that can affect a recipes final gravity (i.e. aeration levels, wort nutrients, grist, yeast health/vitality and pitch rate, fermentation temperature, etc). 

The only way to really guess at the final gravity is simply to brew the same recipe a bunch of times using the exact same process each time and observing your final gravity ranges from those.  Then you can predict for the future where that FG might finish at.