[dean]

Anybody read this? 

http://www.2beerguys.com/blog/2009/05/06/beer_law_bells_brewery/

[sienabrewer]

I hope they win.  The three tier system is something that needs to come tumbling down. 

[dean]

I'm not a lawyer but if the three tier system wasn't supported by the government, or somebody did it on another product wouldn't it be considered illegal?  I don't know... but everytime I hear or read about racketeering it reminds me of the distribution system, whether thats the correct term or not I don't know but what they do sure seems like something Al Capone did.   Maybe they only cared back then because they weren't collecting any tax off it though, no permit fees etc.     I think the Mafia still exists, they just have different spellings of it now... c-o-n-g-r-e-s-s, s-e-n-a-t-e, etc. etc.   

[sienabrewer]

I'm not a lawyer but if the three tier system wasn't supported by the government, or somebody did it on another product wouldn't it be considered illegal? 

Probably.  The reason it isn't considered so in the first place is because of this country's archaic and absurd view on alcohol.  I think it is laughable how the 3 tier was put in place to prevent monopoly, but instead has created once of the biggest, legal monopolies.  With the amount of red tape and fees a brewery has to pay to even get going, they should be allowed to sell to whoever they want directly.  It would increase competition by allowing for greater access.  There is frankly no legitimate reason why this system still needs to be in place. 

[hopfenundmalz]

Is that still on going, or has it been settled?  The story linked is over a year old. 

Anyone know what happened?  Kent Beverage Company is now listed as the distributor for Eaton County (Lansing).

[a10t2]

I hope they win.  The three tier system is something that needs to come tumbling down.

Only 12 states left that don't allow some form of self-distribution.

[sienabrewer]

I hope they win.  The three tier system is something that needs to come tumbling down.

Only 12 states left that don't allow some form of self-distribution.

It's not that simply though.  What I mean is that a brewery should be allowed to brew their beer, put it in their truck, and sell it to whomever they want (stores, grocery, bars, etc).  And I don't mean distribute through some other subsidiary they have to set up and wholly own, or creating their own "distribution company" to sell their beer like Brooklyn did.  Just like a baker makes the bread, puts it in the truck, and delivers it.  The same should apply to breweries.

[dbeechum]

Given the screaming mimi fits that the distributors put up whenever states put in limited self-distribution, I can't see that happening. Plus even here in Cali where if I'm reading the BA site  on self-distribution correctly, many breweries at some growth point throw in the self-distribution towel to focus solely on the brewing

[sienabrewer]

many breweries at some growth point throw in the self-distribution towel to focus solely on the brewing

Which means there will still be a market and need for these distributor jackasses.  If they are not going to entertain the idea of taking on a small label than that small label should be able to go out and compete on its own right.  Then if a distributor decides it may want to take the label after seeing the success they would have to play by the brewery's terms, not their own.  At least that is how I hope it would go.

[dbeechum]

I agree that the whole "lock-in" process that some states enforce against a beer is a crime.

[BrewingRover]

Here's an interesting blog post by a distributor on the proliferation of brands. I think he's full of it, but there is some food for thought there. Greg Koch of Stone weighs in in the comments

[bonjour]

Here's an interesting blog post by a distributor on the proliferation of brands. I think he's full of it, but there is some food for thought there. Greg Koch of Stone weighs in in the comments

and it is where?

[a10t2]

Only 12 states left that don't allow some form of self-distribution.

What I mean is that a brewery should be allowed to brew their beer, put it in their truck, and sell it to whomever they want (stores, grocery, bars, etc).

FWIW I agree completely. I was just pointing out that self-distribution is legal in 34 states (sorry, my memory was off). And in fact 26 states allow a brewery to do exactly what you describe, although there's generally a production cap of anywhere from 10,000 to 300,000 bbl/year. Drew posted a link to the BA page that links to the relevant legislation: http://www.brewersassociation.org/pages/government-affairs/self-distribution-laws

[dean]

Wow... maybe the "distributorship" is too big to let fail, so they protect them from it.     

[BrewingRover]

Here's an interesting blog post by a distributor on the proliferation of brands. I think he's full of it, but there is some food for thought there. Greg Koch of Stone weighs in in the comments

and it is where?

Ah, crap, forgot the link
http://worldclassbeverages.wordpress.com/2010/03/10/less-is-more-are-there-too-many-beers/