While I appreciate the response, I am not sure that this explanation fully answered my question (please don't take offense). Aren't both populations of yeast cells (a starter going to fermentation completion and a batch of beer wort fermenting to completion of which to be repitched as slurry) considered to be in quiescence? And if so, wouldn't both of their UFA and ergosterol reserves pretty much be used up at this point, potentially making for a "not so healthy" pitch?
Thanks for helping me trying to wrap my head around this....
While I appreciate the response, I am not sure that this explanation fully answered my question (please don't take offense). Aren't both populations of yeast cells (a starter going to fermentation completion and a batch of beer wort fermenting to completion of which to be repitched as slurry) considered to be in quiescence? And if so, wouldn't both of their UFA and ergosterol reserves pretty much be used up at this point, potentially making for a "not so healthy" pitch?
Thanks for helping me trying to wrap my head around this....
I may be wrong, but I believe that you are equating health of the pitch with the health of the fermentation. That's not how things work. Improved health and activity have one big advantage; namely, they reduce the lag phase. The lag phase is the period of time between pitching the cells and the beginning of replication (i.e., the logarithmic or exponential phase). It is not the period of time between pitching the cells and signs of fermentation. That definition of lag phase is misnomer that is unique to the home brewing community. The lag phase is where cellular health is rebuilt by shunting O
2 and carbon to the respirative metabolic pathway for the sythesization of ergosterol and UFAs. Quiescent cells can become healthy cells, that is, if their cell walls have not been damaged via physical forces such as shear stress and there is enough O
2 in solution. Quiescent cells just require more time in the lag phase and more O
2 than active cells that are pitched at high krausen.
The reason why we make a starter is to shorten what I am going to refer to as time-to-own. Time-to-own is the period of time between pitching our culture and our culturing owning the wort. None of our breweries are sterile. Our culture is in a battle with other microflora that reproduce at a faster rate. Sanitize is not a synonym for sterilize. Sanitized items still harbor live vegetative cells. These surfaces just harbor far fewer vegetative cells than they did before they were sanitized. This battle means that we need to do whatever we can to shorten time-to-own. We do that by shortening the lag phase and/or the exponential phase. My method attempts to shorten the lag phase via pitching at high krausen. Cells at high krausen are active and have higher ergosterol and UFA reserves. Cells pitched at high krausen have already started replicating by the time that quiescent cells have reversed the morphological changes that occurred at the end of fermentation and replenished their ergosterol and UFA reserves.
While the cells from slurry and a fermented to completion starter are quiescent, they are not quite equal. We can look at the cells in slurry as tired battle hardened soldiers and the cells in a fermented-out starter as tired untested soldiers. The cells in slurry have been through a "real world" fermentation in our brewery. Starter wort is not a real world medium (at least not in American breweries
). The cells that are not going to hack it in our brewery have already been weeded out in slurry via selective pressure. An advantage that cannot be overlooked is the sheer number of cells available in slurry. A 2L starter contains roughly 1/10th the number of cells in a 5-gallon batch. While the lag phase is not shorter when pitching slurry, we have more control over the length of the exponential phase; hence, shortening time-to-own. Anyone who has ever pitched the entire cake from a fermentation has witnessed how quickly active fermentation starts. That's because the exponential phase has almost been completely eliminated.
In end, one should look at slurry as a brewery convenience, not the end all, be all of yeast cultures. Repitching slurry is something that we adopted from the commercial world where the practice is critical to remaining profitable in many cases. Ideally, we want to serially repitch to place selective pressure on a culture, plate the culture for isolates, and grow new seed culture from the best performing isolate. If we go through that process enough times, we will end up with a culture that is robust in our brewery (however, me may not care for the flavor that it produces).