I'm so glad you all found this information interesting. I have plans to send off more samples of different xBmt beers for lab testing, should be pretty fascinating!
Its funny but even after reading it I still had that feeling of irrational doubt. Its amazing how being repeatedly told that something is out there, even if youve never seen it, can stick in your mind even after the light is turned on and you see that there's no boogeyman.
My next two brews are pils lagers and have been adjusted to 60min boils.
When I first started this xBmt series, I felt a similar sense of doubt. Having brewed so many beers that should have been f##ked up yet weren't is certainly decreasing my trepidation. But yeah, old habits die hard.
I wonder how much DMS is in unboiled wort.
So do I! I was chatting with someone yesterday who was actually at MBAA and struck up a conversation with the folks from Weyermann about this data. Really curious to hear about that!
60 minute boils from here on out, starting with the German pils that's coming up soon.
I've been doing this for the last couple years without issue, so I'll be boiling for even less from here on out
I wonder how much DMS is in unboiled wort.
Also, I wonder how much SMM remains in the short-boil beer compared to the 90-minute one. In other words, does the 30-minute boil drive everything off, or does something else in the process keep the SMM from being converted to DMS later on down the line.
Another question might be, is there SMM in modern pils malt? If so is there enough to make any detectable difference?
I'm pretty sure it's there, at least based on the preliminary info my contact got from Weyermann, I just think it volatizes much quicker than we conventionally believed... like, before the wort even reaches a boil.
I wonder how much DMS is in unboiled wort.
You definitely still need to boil hard, with no lid. On my last cream ale, I purposely boiled weakly with the lid on, and yes I got DME. It wasn't strong, but it's there.
I'm not convinced we definitely need to boil all that hard... xBmts to come!
Cream Ale traditionally has a charge of flaked maize, sure it wasn't that you were picking up?
Well, I eat crow.
Cheers to your humility!
DMS does certainly exist. A few years back a buddy got a bag of malt that he used on two consecutive brews. Both rotten with DMS. He bought a new bag of the same malt and maltster, but from a different shop, and there was no DMS. Maybe he just had terrible luck.
Of course it exists, though I'm becoming more and more convinced what most beer evaluators/judges think is DMS probably isn't. That's not to bash judges, I am one after all, it's just that we often find what we are looking for. I think it's humbling and generally noble to constantly doubt what we think we know.
One of the things I always enjoyed about Mythbusters is that if a myth was busted, they often took the extra step to produce the desired results. A lot of the xBmt's target brewing myths and many seem to be showing no significant difference between the beers. A cool followup would be to see what it does take to actually make a discernible difference.
It seems counter-intuitive to try to make bad beer intentionally, but I think that may help those that are having a hard time letting go of the old myths. For example, if a short boil doesn't cause DMS, then what does? A covered boil? Only certain types of grain? Slow chilling? Covered chilling? I think that is the next step if you really want to drill down further.
As always, the hallmark of good science is that it prompts more question than it answers. You're doing great work, Marshall. Thanks for putting it out there for everyone!
We definitely plan to start doing this kind of stuff, just gotta knock out a few more single variables first. Also, despite the common reference, I don't view myself as a mythbuster at all, in fact the impetus for starting his series, perhaps surprisingly, was to demonstrate how important certain variables were. I expected to make much more s***ty beer than I have.
I have always commented "no DMS" when judging (because I don't find it except in the rarest situations), but maybe it is superfluous for judging comments....
I alluded to it in a previous comment, but I'm gonna go out on a limb and say I'm not convinced judges, when they comment on off flavors, are always really picking it up. Sure, there may be a few instances where it's super obvious, but I think certain ingredients sometimes give the impression of something that, since the judge is focused on it, gets misinterpreted as an off flavor. Hope that doesn't come across as too cynical...