Membership questions? Log in issues? Email info@brewersassociation.org

Author Topic: removing the hot break  (Read 5495 times)

Offline Philbrew

  • Brewmaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 867
Re: removing the hot break
« Reply #15 on: November 14, 2016, 11:27:59 am »
If you drink enough, you'll forget all about it.
I'll drink to that.  :D   Though "drink-to-forget" is a concept that has been around for several thousand years. ;)
Many of us would be on a strict liquid diet if it weren't for pretzels.

Offline Phil_M

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1760
  • Southern Maryland
Re: removing the hot break
« Reply #16 on: November 14, 2016, 12:58:02 pm »
One way BIAB doesn't work is the whole "lift the grain out" thing is pretty much impossible to do without splashing.
Corn is a fine adjunct in beer.

And don't buy stale beer.

Offline Stevie

  • Official Poobah of No Life. (I Got Ban Hammered by Drew)
  • *********
  • Posts: 6858
Re: removing the hot break
« Reply #17 on: November 14, 2016, 01:29:17 pm »
One way BIAB doesn't work is the whole "lift the grain out" thing is pretty much impossible to do without splashing.
I know a lot of diehard BIABers use hoists. It could be done slowly to prevent splashing. Adjusting the mechanical advantage of the pulleys would slow it way down while also reducing the effort of work.

Offline Phil_M

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1760
  • Southern Maryland
Re: removing the hot break
« Reply #18 on: November 14, 2016, 01:50:26 pm »
But then you're losing one of the perceived advantages of BIAB, namely saving time. You'd have to lift it so slowly that all the liquid is allowed to slowly drain from the grain, which would be a long amount of time.

I used to BIAB. Having converted to a cooler mash tun, I really don't see much advantage to BIAB unless you're committed to only having one vessel.
Corn is a fine adjunct in beer.

And don't buy stale beer.

Offline lupulus

  • Brewer
  • ****
  • Posts: 391
  • Think like a proton, stay positive!
Re: removing the hot break
« Reply #19 on: November 14, 2016, 02:12:59 pm »
As Stevie mentioned, if you lift slowly there is no splashing. It is about 2 to 3 minutes.  At this time you have one liter of wort in the bag. If you discard this liter, you have less oxygen uptake than with any other method. You can also save this liter having it drip if you consider this minimal.
In transferring, even when to the bottom of the other vessel, you will get exposure to oxygen of the initial volume that you transfer; this exposure can be less than BIAB or can be more, I do not know.

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

“The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.”  Neil deGrasse Tyson

Offline homoeccentricus

  • Brewmaster General
  • *******
  • Posts: 2009
  • A twerp from Antwerp
Re: removing the hot break
« Reply #20 on: November 14, 2016, 02:46:42 pm »
I used to BIAB. Having converted to a cooler mash tun, I really don't see much advantage to BIAB unless you're committed to only having one vessel.

Guess what, no-sparge really works very well ;)
Frank P.

Staggering on the shoulders of giant dwarfs.

Offline Philbrew

  • Brewmaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 867
Re: removing the hot break
« Reply #21 on: November 14, 2016, 03:07:49 pm »
One way BIAB doesn't work is the whole "lift the grain out" thing is pretty much impossible to do without splashing.
I know a lot of diehard BIABers use hoists. It could be done slowly to prevent splashing. Adjusting the mechanical advantage of the pulleys would slow it way down while also reducing the effort of work.
While I am "committed to a one vessel system" for storage reasons, pulling the bag slowly with no splash is easy and takes no extra time.  I have a two part ratcheting block and tackle http://www.brewinabag.com/collections/frontpage/products/pulley-metal-ratchet-250-lbs-capacity.  I pull the bag halfway and let drain for 5 min. while I do something else (weigh out hops or whatever).  Then pull it until it's just touching the wort and do something else for 5 min.  All the while the burner is on high.
Many of us would be on a strict liquid diet if it weren't for pretzels.

Offline reverseapachemaster

  • Official Poobah of No Life. (I Got Ban Hammered by Drew)
  • *********
  • Posts: 3780
    • Brain Sparging on Brewing
Re: removing the hot break
« Reply #22 on: November 15, 2016, 12:28:35 am »
I am hardly an expert on the LODO technique but it seems like lifting the bag, no matter how slowly, creates opportunity for wort to suffer aeration even if it is just an amount draining off/out of the grain. There is also the inevitable wort squeezed out of the grain purely due to the weight of grain above that is descending through the air and splashing around in the wort beneath it.

I suppose this is not a problem if you use the bag purely as a filter and do not lift the grain bag out of the vessel.
Heck yeah I blog about homebrewing: Brain Sparging on Brewing

Offline homoeccentricus

  • Brewmaster General
  • *******
  • Posts: 2009
  • A twerp from Antwerp
Re: removing the hot break
« Reply #23 on: November 15, 2016, 05:07:59 am »
Would an additional addition of smb  just prior to lifting the malt pipe/bag make sense? With a no-sparge the initial amount is only 50 ppm max.
Frank P.

Staggering on the shoulders of giant dwarfs.

The Beerery

  • Guest
Re: removing the hot break
« Reply #24 on: November 15, 2016, 06:37:08 am »
I suppose this is not a problem if you use the bag purely as a filter and do not lift the grain bag out of the vessel.

This is exactly what I do on my 3 vessel system. A custom made fine mesh bag as a mash filter, and allows me to clean the mash tun super easy. It never gets touched /lifted until clean up time.

The Beerery

  • Guest
Re: removing the hot break
« Reply #25 on: November 15, 2016, 06:37:49 am »
Would an additional addition of smb  just prior to lifting the malt pipe/bag make sense? With a no-sparge the initial amount is only 50 ppm max.

Without the sulfite test strips you won't know what you are consuming, so its hard to say.

Offline homoeccentricus

  • Brewmaster General
  • *******
  • Posts: 2009
  • A twerp from Antwerp
Re: removing the hot break
« Reply #26 on: November 15, 2016, 07:17:52 am »
Would an additional addition of smb  just prior to lifting the malt pipe/bag make sense? With a no-sparge the initial amount is only 50 ppm max.

Without the sulfite test strips you won't know what you are consuming, so its hard to say.

Say I buy those strips, I should measure 0-10 ppm before adding anything?
Frank P.

Staggering on the shoulders of giant dwarfs.

The Beerery

  • Guest
Re: removing the hot break
« Reply #27 on: November 15, 2016, 07:18:34 am »
Would an additional addition of smb  just prior to lifting the malt pipe/bag make sense? With a no-sparge the initial amount is only 50 ppm max.

Without the sulfite test strips you won't know what you are consuming, so its hard to say.

Say I buy those strips, I should measure 0-10 ppm before adding anything?
You should measure 0

http://www.lowoxygenbrewing.com/uncategorized/sulfite-testing-strips/
« Last Edit: November 15, 2016, 07:22:47 am by The Beerery »

Offline homoeccentricus

  • Brewmaster General
  • *******
  • Posts: 2009
  • A twerp from Antwerp
Re: removing the hot break
« Reply #28 on: November 15, 2016, 07:23:11 am »
I have found these - https://www.allergenenconsultancy.nl/product/sneltestenanalyse/sulfiet-sneltest-quantofix where you have to bring the pH to 12 before measuring. Any good?
Frank P.

Staggering on the shoulders of giant dwarfs.

The Beerery

  • Guest
Re: removing the hot break
« Reply #29 on: November 15, 2016, 07:25:14 am »
I have found these - https://www.allergenenconsultancy.nl/product/sneltestenanalyse/sulfiet-sneltest-quantofix where you have to bring the pH to 12 before measuring. Any good?
Edited my original response to include the links..