After thinking about my test I'm thinking I did the higher gravity tests wrong. As I understand it, the established values for S.G. contributions of stuff like sugar and DME are based on X amount of the product and water to make a given volume, in America pounds per gallon. Correct? If so, if I really wanted to be as accurate as possible, rather than adding another ounce of sugar to my previous solution after each step, I should have weighed out the correct amount of sugar for the next level and added water to make the volume, right? What I did probably only made a tiny difference in the test solution, but even one or two gravity points can be significant if your intent is to measure the accuracy of your measuring devices.
It's kind of crazy when viewed from one perspective, I can pick up a tape measure anywhere for a couple bucks that is just as accurate as anything on the market, at any price, but $100 plus for a refractometer or close to that for a hydrometer gets me something which is no more accurate than the $4 one I bought in 1984. Coulda saved myself a couple hundred bucks on junk equipment if I'd known what I had was as good as it gets. There has to be a space in that scenario for an enterprising inventor to make a fortune. Whadda shame that I'm not a creative genius.