Membership questions? Log in issues? Email info@brewersassociation.org

Author Topic: Using a bottling bucket as intermediary for secondary fermentation  (Read 1876 times)

Offline BrewNewb

  • 1st Kit
  • *
  • Posts: 2
I'm hoping to do a secondary fermentation for two batches that are currently fermenting in carboys and am curious if I can siphon the beer into a bottling bucket, clean and sanitize each respective carboy, and then transfer the beer back into that same carboy it's currently fermenting in? My concerns are:

1. Contamination from the potential of germs around the bottling bucket nozzle

2. Contamination from increased exposure to air by transferring the beer twice

3. Contamination from exposure to 1.5 gallons of empty space at the top of the carboy (though that won't really be much different than just leaving it in the carboy it's currently sitting in).

Any thoughts/insights would be much appreciated.

Offline Robert

  • Official Poobah of No Life. (I Got Ban Hammered by Drew)
  • *********
  • Posts: 4214
Re: Using a bottling bucket as intermediary for secondary fermentation
« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2019, 05:55:36 am »
Contamination is not the biggest risk.  You will be heavily oxidizing your beer.  There is no benefit to racking the beer for what old homebrew books called "secondary fermentation."  Just leave it in the carboy until it is ready to bottle.  The "empty space" in the carboy is currently filled with CO2.
Rob Stein
Akron, Ohio

I'd rather have questions I can't answer than answers I can't question.

Offline reverseapachemaster

  • Official Poobah of No Life. (I Got Ban Hammered by Drew)
  • *********
  • Posts: 3781
    • Brain Sparging on Brewing
Re: Using a bottling bucket as intermediary for secondary fermentation
« Reply #2 on: January 31, 2019, 08:15:44 am »
You can do what you propose but--why?

You didn't mention anything about the beer that seems to necessitate racking the beer to secondary. If you don't need to rack it unnecessarily then you shouldn't to avoid needless oxidation opportunities. As Robert points out, contamination is far less of a risk than oxidation.
Heck yeah I blog about homebrewing: Brain Sparging on Brewing

Offline BrewNewb

  • 1st Kit
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: Using a bottling bucket as intermediary for secondary fermentation
« Reply #3 on: January 31, 2019, 12:28:35 pm »
Much appreciated!

Offline spurviance

  • Assistant Brewer
  • ***
  • Posts: 186
Re: Using a bottling bucket as intermediary for secondary fermentation
« Reply #4 on: February 04, 2019, 09:51:25 pm »
You can do what you propose but--why?

You didn't mention anything about the beer that seems to necessitate racking the beer to secondary. If you don't need to rack it unnecessarily then you shouldn't to avoid needless oxidation opportunities. As Robert points out, contamination is far less of a risk than oxidation.

This seems to be the common theme I'm hearing about the old tradition of transferring to secondary after initial fermentation.  The fears were oxidation if beer left in a plastic bucket more than 3 weeks or so, and that too much time in contact with the trub can lead to off-flavors.  Now it seems like everyone leaves in glass or stainless from primary to packaging with no perceivable change to the beer from the trub.
On tap,  Vienna Lager, Doppelbock, Dortmunder Export, Pale Ale, Porter, Saison

Fermenting, Saison

Offline Pope of Dope

  • Assistant Brewer
  • ***
  • Posts: 170
  • Gozer is a hoser.
Re: Using a bottling bucket as intermediary for secondary fermentation
« Reply #5 on: February 05, 2019, 12:32:41 am »
I think my beer got better when I started skipping the secondary. I use plastic, glass, and SS with no real noticeable difference other than the damn sexiness of the SS. At this point I do a purged transfer from fermenter to keg. I have had oxidation problems and they are noticeable and disappointing.
Generally you don't see that kind of behavior in a major appliance.

Offline spurviance

  • Assistant Brewer
  • ***
  • Posts: 186
Re: Using a bottling bucket as intermediary for secondary fermentation
« Reply #6 on: February 05, 2019, 08:55:21 am »
I think my beer got better when I started skipping the secondary. I use plastic, glass, and SS with no real noticeable difference other than the damn sexiness of the SS. At this point I do a purged transfer from fermenter to keg. I have had oxidation problems and they are noticeable and disappointing.

When you say you do a 'purged transfer' are you referring to purging the keg with CO2 before transferring?  And how are you transferring? 
On tap,  Vienna Lager, Doppelbock, Dortmunder Export, Pale Ale, Porter, Saison

Fermenting, Saison

Offline denny

  • Administrator
  • Retired with too much time on my hands
  • *****
  • Posts: 27129
  • Noti OR [1991.4, 287.6deg] AR
    • Dennybrew
Re: Using a bottling bucket as intermediary for secondary fermentation
« Reply #7 on: February 05, 2019, 09:11:26 am »
You can do what you propose but--why?

You didn't mention anything about the beer that seems to necessitate racking the beer to secondary. If you don't need to rack it unnecessarily then you shouldn't to avoid needless oxidation opportunities. As Robert points out, contamination is far less of a risk than oxidation.

This seems to be the common theme I'm hearing about the old tradition of transferring to secondary after initial fermentation.  The fears were oxidation if beer left in a plastic bucket more than 3 weeks or so, and that too much time in contact with the trub can lead to off-flavors.  Now it seems like everyone leaves in glass or stainless from primary to packaging with no perceivable change to the beer from the trub.

I use buckets with no secondary and weeks long primaries...not intentionally, just sometimes works out that way.  A forum search would have turned up this...https://www.homebrewersassociation.org/forum/index.php?topic=15108.msg191642#msg191642
Life begins at 60.....1.060, that is!

www.dennybrew.com

The best, sharpest, funniest, weirdest and most knowledgable minds in home brewing contribute on the AHA forum. - Alewyfe

"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell

Offline Pope of Dope

  • Assistant Brewer
  • ***
  • Posts: 170
  • Gozer is a hoser.
Re: Using a bottling bucket as intermediary for secondary fermentation
« Reply #8 on: February 07, 2019, 12:06:05 am »
I think my beer got better when I started skipping the secondary. I use plastic, glass, and SS with no real noticeable difference other than the damn sexiness of the SS. At this point I do a purged transfer from fermenter to keg. I have had oxidation problems and they are noticeable and disappointing.

When you say you do a 'purged transfer' are you referring to purging the keg with CO2 before transferring?  And how are you transferring?

What I do is the take the following steps:

1. Sanitize the keg with with sanitizer of choice.

2. Connect CO2 tank and use it to empty the keg of it's sanitizer until gas comes out the party hose.

3. Open keg and fill with beer.

It's not a closed transfer, but you can see the CO2 fog over the beer you're putting in. 
Generally you don't see that kind of behavior in a major appliance.