I think beer competitions can be backwards. What I mean is the judges look for faults to eliminate beers until they have a ‘least worst’ winner. That’s a fairly negative based scenario in my mind.
Couple that with some judges expecting beers to be a clone of their favorite in the style (regardless of whether that beer meets the guidelines or not) vs following the guidelines and you may have some skewed results.
I do think guidelines are important to categorize beers to organize a competition. But limiting creativity outside a competition probably shouldn’t be the outcome.
Again, it’s kinda backwards where instead of letting brewers use imagination and to encourage creativity, the guidelines tend to box homebrewers into a left and right range fan. However, most of the best beers I’ve had probably don’t meet the guidelines in one respect or another.
Routinely at least one of the little dots in BeerSmith is a little too this or a little too that with my beers. I used to adjust my recipe to align the dots but decided that’s BS. As a result, I try to select a style that fits my design fairly close vs fit my design to a strict style guideline. ...but I don’t worry too much about competitions either.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk