Membership questions? Log in issues? Email info@brewersassociation.org

Author Topic: BIAB / Grainfather style grain basket: perforated on all sides or bottom only?  (Read 4537 times)

Offline frankvw

  • 1st Kit
  • *
  • Posts: 7
I've been a three-vessel all-grain brewer for years and I enjoy this type of setup, but there is something to be said for the portability of a single vessel system as well. For one, the latter is easier to take to club brewing days, not to mention the fact that it's so much simpler to store.

With that in mind I'm looking at building a "grainfather style" BIAB-ish setup. I'm on a tight budget so it's definitely DIY time. I'll be using an electric water urn which I will fit with a stainless steel grain basket, a magnetic drive pump and assorted plumbing, plus an electronic thermostat and thyristor-based power control. The latter will be able to "throttle down" the urn's 3kW element to a few watts to gently raise or maintain wort temperature.

The first question I've come up with is the grain basket. I have two options here: use mesh on all sides, or just at the bottom. Mesh on all sides has the advantage of reducing the risk of a stuck sparge, while having mesh only a the bottom will ensure a laminar flow that should optimize extraction efficiency (in that the water running through it has to flow through all parts of the grain bed on its way from top to bottom).

What are your thoughts on this? Which one would be preferable and why?

// FvW


Offline kramerog

  • Brewmaster General
  • *******
  • Posts: 2262
    • My LinkedIn page
If you are going to recirculate water to heat up your mash then you would only want mesh at the bottom.  I've heard of the grainfather but I'm not familiar with the grainfather setup.

Offline denny

  • Administrator
  • Retired with too much time on my hands
  • *****
  • Posts: 27129
  • Noti OR [1991.4, 287.6deg] AR
    • Dennybrew
If you are going to recirculate water to heat up your mash then you would only want mesh at the bottom.  I've heard of the grainfather but I'm not familiar with the grainfather setup.

I am.  It uses basically a false bottoms.  That's what I'd recommend.
Life begins at 60.....1.060, that is!

www.dennybrew.com

The best, sharpest, funniest, weirdest and most knowledgable minds in home brewing contribute on the AHA forum. - Alewyfe

"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell

Offline ynotbrusum

  • Official Poobah of No Life. (I Got Ban Hammered by Drew)
  • *********
  • Posts: 4887
The Foundry system uses a false bottom and partial height side screening.  I have it and can recommend that approach, as well, if you can fabricate something like it.

Hodge Garage Brewing: "Brew with a glad heart!"

Offline mabrungard

  • I spend way too much time on the AHA forum
  • ********
  • Posts: 2903
  • Water matters!
    • Bru'n Water
Any screening on the sides will create short circuiting and insufficient flow through the rest of the grist. A friend of mine created a screened container for his brewing system (sides and bottom screened). The flow was intended to go from the top of the grist, downward. He had incredibly poor efficiency until he inserted a solid sheet of stainless around the entire circumference to get the flow to exit the bottom of the grist.
Martin B
Carmel, IN

BJCP National
Foam Blowers of Indiana (FBI)

Brewing Water Information at:
https://www.brunwater.com/

Like Bru'n Water on Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/Brun-Water-464551136933908/?ref=bookmarks

Offline denny

  • Administrator
  • Retired with too much time on my hands
  • *****
  • Posts: 27129
  • Noti OR [1991.4, 287.6deg] AR
    • Dennybrew
Any screening on the sides will create short circuiting and insufficient flow through the rest of the grist. A friend of mine created a screened container for his brewing system (sides and bottom screened). The flow was intended to go from the top of the grist, downward. He had incredibly poor efficiency until he inserted a solid sheet of stainless around the entire circumference to get the flow to exit the bottom of the grist.

Exactly what I'd expect.
Life begins at 60.....1.060, that is!

www.dennybrew.com

The best, sharpest, funniest, weirdest and most knowledgable minds in home brewing contribute on the AHA forum. - Alewyfe

"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell

Offline ynotbrusum

  • Official Poobah of No Life. (I Got Ban Hammered by Drew)
  • *********
  • Posts: 4887
With the Foundry System approach, in my experience you should not use the system with very small grain batches for that reason (grain bed depth concerns and side channeling out the mesh sides).  It works perfectly well with 8-10 pounds of grain or more - again, it is based on my experience with the system.  And running a recirc should be at a very slow rate to maximize the efficiency - but I knew that from my larger HERMS using the 20gallon InfuSSion mash tun... many people seem to run their recirc full bore (I went away from that very early on).
Hodge Garage Brewing: "Brew with a glad heart!"

Offline dansensel

  • 1st Kit
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Foundry now has a small batch adapter to cover the side screens if the mash is smaller.  Great thing about blichmann is that they listen to customers and offer solutions.  I am anxiously waiting to be able to order my foundry.  Backorders suck.

Offline ynotbrusum

  • Official Poobah of No Life. (I Got Ban Hammered by Drew)
  • *********
  • Posts: 4887
Yes, I have the inner ring small batch adapter.  I use it all the time on many batches regardless of grain Bill size. 
Hodge Garage Brewing: "Brew with a glad heart!"

Offline erockrph

  • I must live here
  • **********
  • Posts: 7792
  • Chepachet, RI
    • The Hop WHisperer
With the Foundry System approach, in my experience you should not use the system with very small grain batches for that reason (grain bed depth concerns and side channeling out the mesh sides).  It works perfectly well with 8-10 pounds of grain or more - again, it is based on my experience with the system.  And running a recirc should be at a very slow rate to maximize the efficiency - but I knew that from my larger HERMS using the 20gallon InfuSSion mash tun... many people seem to run their recirc full bore (I went away from that very early on).

Interesting. I got the 6.5 gallon model a few months ago and the basket was only perforated on the bottom. I don't know if this is a new change or if it's specific to the smaller system, but there are no side perforations on mine.
Eric B.

Finally got around to starting a homebrewing blog: The Hop Whisperer

Offline ynotbrusum

  • Official Poobah of No Life. (I Got Ban Hammered by Drew)
  • *********
  • Posts: 4887
The smaller one is set up that way, I understand.  I retrofitted with the side blocker on the larger unit.
Hodge Garage Brewing: "Brew with a glad heart!"

Offline purduekenn

  • Brewer
  • ****
  • Posts: 421
Yes, I have the inner ring small batch adapter.  I use it all the time on many batches regardless of grain Bill size.
Interesting I'll have to try that on my Anvil 10.5

Offline weazletoe

  • Brewmaster General
  • *******
  • Posts: 2437
  • Howland, Ohio
I just picked up Brewzilla 3.1.1 for $350. I doubt you can build anything that cheap. Especially with a pump included.

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

A man works hard all week, so he doesn't have to wear pants all weekend.