Membership questions? Log in issues? Email info@brewersassociation.org

Author Topic: Lallemand London ESB Yeast  (Read 4924 times)

Offline goose

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1287
Lallemand London ESB Yeast
« on: January 23, 2020, 10:13:58 am »
Has anyone used this strain of yeast?  I got a couple of packs of it as swag at a recent homebrew competition and am thinking of using it for my next batch of ESB.  I am curious as to what the esteemed members of this forum think about it.

My normal go to yeast for ESB is WLP-002.  Is the Lallemand better or worse or about the same.
Goose Steingass
Wooster, OH
Society of Akron Area Zymurgists (SAAZ)
Wayne County Brew Club
Mansfield Brew Club
BJCP Certified

Offline Steve Ruch

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1743
Re: Lallemand London ESB Yeast
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2020, 10:27:03 am »
I used it in an ordinary bitter with good results.
I love to go swimmin'
with hairy old women

Offline tommymorris

  • Official Poobah of No Life. (I Got Ban Hammered by Drew)
  • *********
  • Posts: 3869
Re: Lallemand London ESB Yeast
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2020, 12:14:43 pm »
I have a pack but haven’t used it yet. Some things to note. It doesn’t ferment maltotriose. From the manufacturer website: “... does not utilize the sugar maltotriose (a molecule composed of 3 glucose units). Maltotriose is present in wort in an average 10-15% of all malt worts. The result will be fuller body and residual sweetness in beer. “

I read somewhere it was selected because it tastes closest to Fullers ESB yeast. Not sure if that is true or not but the name certainly implies such.

Offline mchrispen

  • Brewmaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 713
    • Accidentalis Brewing Blog
Re: Lallemand London ESB Yeast
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2020, 01:00:48 pm »
It’s lovely, bit make sure to use some sugar or syrup to dry out the beer a bit.

Currently brewing through a bunch of English styles - this is really leaving subtle esters supporting the hops and a fantastic body.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Matt Chrispen
Sometime Austin Zealot
Blogging from the garage @ accidentalis.com
>> Bru'n Water Spreadsheet Walkthroughs<<
>> Bru'n Water Subscriber Version 5.3 Spreadsheet Walkthrough <<

Offline JohnnyC

  • Cellarman
  • **
  • Posts: 67
Re: Lallemand London ESB Yeast
« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2020, 01:18:59 pm »
I use it often. It's a beast and ferments very quickly. I just mash low (149-150 F) and hit the gravities I'm targeting. Makes a nice English ale (brown, ESB, etc).

Offline hopfenundmalz

  • Global Moderator
  • I must live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 10678
  • Milford, MI
Re: Lallemand London ESB Yeast
« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2020, 01:49:34 pm »
It’s lovely, bit make sure to use some sugar or syrup to dry out the beer a bit.

Currently brewing through a bunch of English styles - this is really leaving subtle esters supporting the hops and a fantastic body.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I remember this from the other night's session.

When I get home, might try another Best Bitter with invert #3, this yeast, enough SO4 to make it longer on the tongue but not smell of wet drywall.
Jeff Rankert
AHA Lifetime Member
BJCP National
Ann Arbor Brewers Guild
Home-brewing, not just a hobby, it is a lifestyle!

Offline Megary

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1129
Re: Lallemand London ESB Yeast
« Reply #6 on: August 30, 2021, 04:50:10 pm »
I just used this yeast for the first time.  3 gallons in the fermenter of a 1.052 Porter.  Got going in about 3-4 hours, a nice Krausen and bouncing airlock by 15 and apparently just about finished in 30.  What is this…Windsor vII?

Offline Bel Air Brewing

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1398
Re: Lallemand London ESB Yeast
« Reply #7 on: August 30, 2021, 05:12:49 pm »
It’s lovely, bit make sure to use some sugar or syrup to dry out the beer a bit.

Currently brewing through a bunch of English styles - this is really leaving subtle esters supporting the hops and a fantastic body.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I remember this from the other night's session.

When I get home, might try another Best Bitter with invert #3, this yeast, enough SO4 to make it longer on the tongue but not smell of wet drywall.


Why...we always go for that wet-drywall taste and aroma. Can't beat it!
Just kidding, of course! Laughed my rear off when I saw that description!

Offline dmtaylor

  • Official Poobah of No Life. (I Got Ban Hammered by Drew)
  • *********
  • Posts: 4724
  • Lord Idiot the Lazy
    • YEAST MASTER Perma-Living
Re: Lallemand London ESB Yeast
« Reply #8 on: August 30, 2021, 05:45:51 pm »
I just used this yeast for the first time.  3 gallons in the fermenter of a 1.052 Porter.  Got going in about 3-4 hours, a nice Krausen and bouncing airlock by 15 and apparently just about finished in 30.  What is this…Windsor vII?

YES.  The two strains are genetically almost identical.  The main difference I have seen is that London attenuates to about 67% average, a little more than Windsor which for me averages much lower about 60%.  Both will complete most of the fermentation within about 40 hours, dragging out the last gravity point for a few more days maybe.

I love both.  These are nice tools to keep in the toolbox, handy for producing very flavorful malty beers without high alcohol, for those interested in more sessionable strength beers.
Dave

The world will become a much more pleasant place to live when each and every one of us realizes that we are all idiots.

Offline beerphilmcd

  • Assistant Brewer
  • ***
  • Posts: 131
  • Enzymatic activity excites me!
Re: Lallemand London ESB Yeast
« Reply #9 on: August 30, 2021, 08:00:32 pm »
I hate this yeast and Windsor which many think is like lallemand ESB. Though I get rotting wood not rotting dry wall from Windsor I get pear esters an tons more pear esters until the beer has aged and dropped clear for a bit then I get some funkiness and bitter peach pit. Just not an enjoyable yeast when wlp 007, 002, wy1469 and others are so good. Heck I LOVE super clean Nottingham and prefer the esters I can get from it when stressed over the ESB results.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"Perhaps wisdom for me is understanding how truely small I am, and that there is no smug self centered moment of clarity when there is so much more to learn" Anthony Bourdain

Offline Megary

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1129
Re: Lallemand London ESB Yeast
« Reply #10 on: August 31, 2021, 07:04:15 am »
I've actually quite enjoyed Windsor the few times that I have used it.  Like dmtaylor, I have only gotten very low 60's attenuation (59% once), but the beer never comes across as sweet. A bit full-bodied, maybe.  "Smooth" might be the best way I could describe it.  Of course, I've only ever used it in a Porter so I'm assuming whatever esters it is kicking is getting lost behind the grains.  Maybe I wouldn't care so much for it in a Bitter or a Mild.

As far as London, I was hoping to get somewhere closer to 70%, but from Dave's earlier post and the current visual inactivity from my fermenter after 2 days post pitch, I'm thinking probably not.  I mashed at 150, but maybe I should have been at 148°.  Would it even make a difference?  I'm beginning to think that for a Porter, there might not be much difference between London and Windsor.  I'll know for sure in a few weeks.


Offline erockrph

  • I must live here
  • **********
  • Posts: 7788
  • Chepachet, RI
    • The Hop WHisperer
Re: Lallemand London ESB Yeast
« Reply #11 on: August 31, 2021, 11:52:49 am »
I just used this yeast for the first time.  3 gallons in the fermenter of a 1.052 Porter.  Got going in about 3-4 hours, a nice Krausen and bouncing airlock by 15 and apparently just about finished in 30.  What is this…Windsor vII?

YES.  The two strains are genetically almost identical.  The main difference I have seen is that London attenuates to about 67% average, a little more than Windsor which for me averages much lower about 60%.  Both will complete most of the fermentation within about 40 hours, dragging out the last gravity point for a few more days maybe.

I love both.  These are nice tools to keep in the toolbox, handy for producing very flavorful malty beers without high alcohol, for those interested in more sessionable strength beers.

Interesting. I honestly haven't gotten much of an ester character from the London ESB the few times I've used it, but I get a nice ester profile out of Windsor that I enjoy. I have a packet of the London ESB for brewing session ales with minimal fermentation character, but I am a lot more likely to reach for Windsor to be honest.
Eric B.

Finally got around to starting a homebrewing blog: The Hop Whisperer

Offline dmtaylor

  • Official Poobah of No Life. (I Got Ban Hammered by Drew)
  • *********
  • Posts: 4724
  • Lord Idiot the Lazy
    • YEAST MASTER Perma-Living
Re: Lallemand London ESB Yeast
« Reply #12 on: August 31, 2021, 02:16:42 pm »
I just used this yeast for the first time.  3 gallons in the fermenter of a 1.052 Porter.  Got going in about 3-4 hours, a nice Krausen and bouncing airlock by 15 and apparently just about finished in 30.  What is this…Windsor vII?

YES.  The two strains are genetically almost identical.  The main difference I have seen is that London attenuates to about 67% average, a little more than Windsor which for me averages much lower about 60%.  Both will complete most of the fermentation within about 40 hours, dragging out the last gravity point for a few more days maybe.

I love both.  These are nice tools to keep in the toolbox, handy for producing very flavorful malty beers without high alcohol, for those interested in more sessionable strength beers.

Interesting. I honestly haven't gotten much of an ester character from the London ESB the few times I've used it, but I get a nice ester profile out of Windsor that I enjoy. I have a packet of the London ESB for brewing session ales with minimal fermentation character, but I am a lot more likely to reach for Windsor to be honest.

Agreed.  I do find Windsor to be more estery, and London relatively more clean.  The yeasts are clearly related, AND... clearly a little different.

Cheers.
Dave

The world will become a much more pleasant place to live when each and every one of us realizes that we are all idiots.

Offline Megary

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1129
Re: Lallemand London ESB Yeast
« Reply #13 on: September 08, 2021, 09:17:03 am »
I just used this yeast for the first time.  3 gallons in the fermenter of a 1.052 Porter.  Got going in about 3-4 hours, a nice Krausen and bouncing airlock by 15 and apparently just about finished in 30.  What is this…Windsor vII?

YES.  The two strains are genetically almost identical.  The main difference I have seen is that London attenuates to about 67% average, a little more than Windsor which for me averages much lower about 60%.  Both will complete most of the fermentation within about 40 hours, dragging out the last gravity point for a few more days maybe.

I love both.  These are nice tools to keep in the toolbox, handy for producing very flavorful malty beers without high alcohol, for those interested in more sessionable strength beers.

So...Kegged yesterday, that 1.052 Porter with London finished at 1.017.  67%!  I think Windsor drops out a bit faster and ends up more compact.  Sample taste of this London Porter is fine (not picking up any noticeable esters) but I'll wait til its all dressed up to decide if I can honestly tell any difference between the two.  For a Porter, I'm guessing I won't be able to.

Offline dmtaylor

  • Official Poobah of No Life. (I Got Ban Hammered by Drew)
  • *********
  • Posts: 4724
  • Lord Idiot the Lazy
    • YEAST MASTER Perma-Living
Re: Lallemand London ESB Yeast
« Reply #14 on: September 08, 2021, 10:15:48 am »
I just used this yeast for the first time.  3 gallons in the fermenter of a 1.052 Porter.  Got going in about 3-4 hours, a nice Krausen and bouncing airlock by 15 and apparently just about finished in 30.  What is this…Windsor vII?

YES.  The two strains are genetically almost identical.  The main difference I have seen is that London attenuates to about 67% average, a little more than Windsor which for me averages much lower about 60%.  Both will complete most of the fermentation within about 40 hours, dragging out the last gravity point for a few more days maybe.

I love both.  These are nice tools to keep in the toolbox, handy for producing very flavorful malty beers without high alcohol, for those interested in more sessionable strength beers.

So...Kegged yesterday, that 1.052 Porter with London finished at 1.017.  67%!  I think Windsor drops out a bit faster and ends up more compact.  Sample taste of this London Porter is fine (not picking up any noticeable esters) but I'll wait til its all dressed up to decide if I can honestly tell any difference between the two.  For a Porter, I'm guessing I won't be able to.

Thanks for the additional data point.  :)   I hope you'll enjoy your London porter.  I do find this yeast to be pretty clean, hardly much esters.
Dave

The world will become a much more pleasant place to live when each and every one of us realizes that we are all idiots.