I'm more than happy, although I don't see any trade offs from my point of view. The malt acts predictably and makes delicious beer. That's good enough for me.
Different folks, different strokes.
Protein, soluble protein, enzyme content, beta glucans vary greatly, not only from variety to variety but also within variety depending on fertilization (affects protein) and weather conditions.
Let's see how many smell malsters can get good malt after the very bad 2021 harvest.
If you can live with 2-3-4 points differences in OG and/or FG, you are right, the trade-offs are minimal.
Sent from my SM-G981U1 using Tapatalk
Hey, I'm curious....have you had problems with craft malts, and if so, which ones?
First, it's not a problem, just a trade-off.
A local malster in Texas I'd rather not name (it's only my take after all).
Two different bags, different years, of their pilsner malt. Similar mash procedure, for attenuation. Same beer. Same fermentation. One malt 1.049 OG to 1.007 FG. Second malt 1.046 to 1.010. First malt was 25% higher protein vs the second one (learned afterwards).
Used others, but not different bags of the same malt.
Sent from my SM-G981U1 using Tapatalk