In our previous brewery setup, the beer was always filtered. We used a dual cartridge - canister filter, 5 micron & 3 micron. The beer was brilliant, tasted very good, and was very stable with what appeared to be a longer shelf life than the non-filtered beers.
I am getting ready to filter 10 of the 20 gallons of 5D that will be put in kegs in a few days. The filters are 3 micron, followed by 1 micron. It is a little more work, of course.
Brulosophy did an experiment where tasters were given a blind triangle test, of filtered and non-filtered beers. The participants could not reliably distinguish the beers from each other.
A total of 27 people of varying levels of experience participated in this xBmt. Each participant was served 2 samples of the unfiltered beer and 1 sample of the filtered beer in different colored opaque cups then asked to identify the unique sample. At this sample size, 14 tasters (p<0.05) would have had to identify the unique sample in order to reach statistical significance, though only 4 (p=0.992) chose the correctly, indicating participants in this xBmt were unable to reliably distinguish an English Bitter that was run through a plate filter from one that was unfiltered.
My Impressions: I simply couldn’t tell these beers apart and resorted to guessing in all of my blind triangle attempts. To my senses, they had the same aroma, flavor, and mouthfeel, despite the obvious difference in appearance. As for the beer, it was really quite delicious, and if I had to choose a preference, it’d go to the filtered version only because I think it’s prettier.
Yes, I know...single data point.
We have used gelatin many, many times. I prefer not to, however.