Membership questions? Log in issues? Email info@brewersassociation.org

Author Topic: Wyeast 1099 nothing day 3  (Read 1530 times)

Offline Troy Walker

  • 1st Kit
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Wyeast 1099 nothing day 3
« on: August 24, 2022, 07:52:23 pm »
Hi folks.  I’ve done enough home brewing that I no longer hover over the fermenter waiting for action to happen.  But it’s now Wednesday night after a Sunday brew day and not a thing from my blond ale with Wyeast 1099.  I didn’t use a starter but rarely do.  Of course the damned internal bag never opened- I still can’t get that to work.

I’m at 68F and lower SG of 1042.  Measuring by Tilt.

Can it be a slow starter?

Offline tommymorris

  • Official Poobah of No Life. (I Got Ban Hammered by Drew)
  • *********
  • Posts: 3869
Re: Wyeast 1099 nothing day 3
« Reply #1 on: August 24, 2022, 08:11:53 pm »
Well. Damn. I think 1042 at 68F is easy pickens for healthy ale yeast. I would be considering pitching a backup.

Offline rburrelli

  • Assistant Brewer
  • ***
  • Posts: 156
Re: Wyeast 1099 nothing day 3
« Reply #2 on: August 25, 2022, 11:24:49 am »
Did you verify with a hydrometer?
11:11 Brewing
“Brewing with Attention and Intention.”

Offline neuse

  • Brewer
  • ****
  • Posts: 308
  • New Bern, NC
Re: Wyeast 1099 nothing day 3
« Reply #3 on: August 25, 2022, 11:49:52 am »
My last batch (Batch #197) had just a very few bubbles and pretty much no kraeusen. That's the first time ever for me. I checked the gravity the other day and it had attenuated 82%. So I would check gravity before panicking.

Offline Village Taphouse

  • Brewmaster General
  • *******
  • Posts: 2327
  • Ken from Chicago
    • The new Mayfair Court Brewhouse
Re: Wyeast 1099 nothing day 3
« Reply #4 on: August 29, 2022, 04:00:11 pm »
I love 1099 but I digress.

I also pitch ale yeast without a starter especially for a lower gravity beer but I would NOT do that if it was a White Labs yeast or Omega yeast where there was no nutrient pack.  When I smack a pack of Wyeast ale yeast and it expands I know it's ready for action and I usually get activity quickly.  But I had a pack of Omega West Coast ale (no nutrient pack with Omega) and I just pitched it.  There was a good 3-4 day lag time and I was not happy.  I would swirl the fermenter and try to rouse it and hope you get activity shortly. 
Ken from Chicago. 
A day without beer is like... just kidding, I have no idea.

Offline kpfoleyjr

  • Cellarman
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: Wyeast 1099 nothing day 3
« Reply #5 on: August 29, 2022, 04:25:59 pm »
I recently had a problem with a pack of Wyeast 2565 Kolsch.  It had a November use by date.  The pack did not swell after I broke the nutrient pouch (my first clue) and then the starter did not take off at all.  I bought another pack at a different LHBS and it worked just like it’s supposed to work.  Sometimes it’s just a bad pack.  I got a survey request e-mail from Northern Brewer asking about my experience and I told them it was a flop.  I received a nice return note in which they apologized and said that someone would contact me - but, guess what?  That never happened.  So I had a delayed brew day and I’m out nine bucks.  A little disappointed, I am.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Village Taphouse

  • Brewmaster General
  • *******
  • Posts: 2327
  • Ken from Chicago
    • The new Mayfair Court Brewhouse
Re: Wyeast 1099 nothing day 3
« Reply #6 on: August 30, 2022, 07:11:28 am »
I know it doesn't help but this is a good reason to look around and find good, dry yeast both ale strains and lager.  S-04 might become my go-to dry ale yeast and between 34/70, Diamond, S-23 and maybe this Cellar Science Baja (which I have not tried yet) there may be enough strains to make it liquid yeast and starters start to drop in popularity.  Yes, the dry yeasts have expiration dates but they're further out and these yeasts make delicious beer. 
Ken from Chicago. 
A day without beer is like... just kidding, I have no idea.

Offline Bob357

  • Brewmaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 895
  • Consensus means nothing to me. I am who I am.
Re: Wyeast 1099 nothing day 3
« Reply #7 on: August 30, 2022, 07:44:11 am »
Agree 100% I switched back to using dry yeasts almost exclusively several years ago and haven't had any of the problems that I'd experienced with liquid strains. I'm confident that liquid yeast quality is just fine when it ships from the producer but there's no telling what conditions it was subject to before you received it. This is especially true if it was shipped during the hotter months.
Beer is my bucket list,

Bob357
Fallon, NV

Offline Megary

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1129
Re: Wyeast 1099 nothing day 3
« Reply #8 on: August 30, 2022, 07:57:48 am »
Not knowing where the OP is from or how he came about his package of 1099, I think to myself that he must have purchased it in the middle of Summer.  Maybe the yeast was very fresh, expertly handled, and kept at an appropriate temp in a well-run LHBS.  But, given the problem, I'll guess not.

I really like a lot of liquid yeast strains, but living in PA and without a LHBS, I have about a 3-4 month window to order them on-line and expect them to remain cold and viable in transit.  I envy those with a nearby shop.

Offline Megary

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1129
Re: Wyeast 1099 nothing day 3
« Reply #9 on: August 30, 2022, 08:03:28 am »
Agree 100% I switched back to using dry yeasts almost exclusively several years ago and haven't had any of the problems that I'd experienced with liquid strains. I'm confident that liquid yeast quality is just fine when it ships from the producer but there's no telling what conditions it was subject to before you received it. This is especially true if it was shipped during the hotter months.

Yes, this.  Pretty much my thoughts, sorry I missed your post.

Offline Village Taphouse

  • Brewmaster General
  • *******
  • Posts: 2327
  • Ken from Chicago
    • The new Mayfair Court Brewhouse
Re: Wyeast 1099 nothing day 3
« Reply #10 on: August 30, 2022, 08:09:32 am »
There are a few strains I like that I feel like I can only get in liquid form (Omega Bayern coms to mind) but otherwise my need for American Ales (BRY-97), English Ales (S-04), German Lagers (Diamond, 34/70) and Mexican Lagers (possibly this Cellar Science Baja) are all pretty much covered.  When I started brewing dry yeasts were common but some of them were not great.  Everyone was talking about how liquid yeast was the only way to go.  That has changed, IMO and more strains will become available I'm sure.  I doubt liquid strains would disappear but just based on my good results, I'm ready to embrace dry in many situations. 
Ken from Chicago. 
A day without beer is like... just kidding, I have no idea.

Offline reverseapachemaster

  • Official Poobah of No Life. (I Got Ban Hammered by Drew)
  • *********
  • Posts: 3777
    • Brain Sparging on Brewing
Re: Wyeast 1099 nothing day 3
« Reply #11 on: August 30, 2022, 10:21:10 am »
It's interesting how long old views linger in homebrewing circles. I remember when I started brewing in the late 2000s the attitude about the superiority of liquid yeast was prominent, but when you see people talking about their individual experience it is almost never bad. Usually it was because they shoehorned WB-06 or T-58 into a recipe expecting something entirely different. The only consistent criticism I see out there now surrounds Mangrove Jack and low viability or whatever their issue is. Across the board the real benefit of liquid yeast over dried yeast is the broader availability of strains.
Heck yeah I blog about homebrewing: Brain Sparging on Brewing

Offline Village Taphouse

  • Brewmaster General
  • *******
  • Posts: 2327
  • Ken from Chicago
    • The new Mayfair Court Brewhouse
Re: Wyeast 1099 nothing day 3
« Reply #12 on: August 30, 2022, 11:04:18 am »
It's interesting how long old views linger in homebrewing circles. I remember when I started brewing in the late 2000s the attitude about the superiority of liquid yeast was prominent, but when you see people talking about their individual experience it is almost never bad. Usually it was because they shoehorned WB-06 or T-58 into a recipe expecting something entirely different. The only consistent criticism I see out there now surrounds Mangrove Jack and low viability or whatever their issue is. Across the board the real benefit of liquid yeast over dried yeast is the broader availability of strains.
That's definitely true.  Think of ALL the English strains, Belgian strains, wide variety of Czech or German lager strains, etc.  I used to like to experiment with different yeasts to see what each one did.  I do less of that now.  I can survive on a handful of strains and some of those have migrated over to dry yeast now.  Will we see all those liquid options come to the world of dry yeast sometime?  I doubt it. 
Ken from Chicago. 
A day without beer is like... just kidding, I have no idea.

Offline Bob357

  • Brewmaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 895
  • Consensus means nothing to me. I am who I am.
Re: Wyeast 1099 nothing day 3
« Reply #13 on: August 30, 2022, 02:26:01 pm »
It's interesting how long old views linger in homebrewing circles. I remember when I started brewing in the late 2000s the attitude about the superiority of liquid yeast was prominent, but when you see people talking about their individual experience it is almost never bad. Usually, it was because they shoehorned WB-06 or T-58 into a recipe expecting something entirely different. The only consistent criticism I see out there now surrounds Mangrove Jack and low viability or whatever their issue is. Across the board the real benefit of liquid yeast over dried yeast is the broader availability of strains.

I've used Mangrove Jack yeasts for 95+% of my brews for several years and have had one problem ferment. It was lower than expected attenuation in an extract brew. Can't pin it down to the yeast. Never a problem with the 150+all-grain ferments. Have you personally had problems with Mangrove Jack yeasts? I think most of the bad things you see are more from poor brewing knowledge or process than the yeast. There are a lot more people to disagree if you bad mouth more popular brands, so MJ is an easy target.
Beer is my bucket list,

Bob357
Fallon, NV

Offline reverseapachemaster

  • Official Poobah of No Life. (I Got Ban Hammered by Drew)
  • *********
  • Posts: 3777
    • Brain Sparging on Brewing
Re: Wyeast 1099 nothing day 3
« Reply #14 on: August 30, 2022, 05:31:15 pm »
I've used Mangrove Jack yeasts for 95+% of my brews for several years and have had one problem ferment. It was lower than expected attenuation in an extract brew. Can't pin it down to the yeast. Never a problem with the 150+all-grain ferments. Have you personally had problems with Mangrove Jack yeasts? I think most of the bad things you see are more from poor brewing knowledge or process than the yeast. There are a lot more people to disagree if you bad mouth more popular brands, so MJ is an easy target.

I've never used any of their strains so I have no personal experience either way. I just see a stream of complaints about sluggish fermentation since they showed up on the market. I see less about saflager or lallemand which are both more established yeast labs. Mangrove Jack seems to be sold in fewer shops these days so whether the criticism is fair, it's certainly not going unnoticed.
Heck yeah I blog about homebrewing: Brain Sparging on Brewing