Author Topic: Crystal vs Cara vs Caramel Malts  (Read 2455 times)

Online gmac

  • Brewmaster General
  • *******
  • Posts: 2024
  • London, Ontario
    • View Profile
Crystal vs Cara vs Caramel Malts
« on: February 16, 2011, 10:19:43 AM »
I'm still working on a grain bill and I'm looking over the items available from my supplier and I see a few products that appear to be pretty similar and I'm curious what the differences are and what the contribute to a brew.

Crystal Malt - I think I know this one fairly well and what it brings (body, colour, flavour)
Cara  - I see this a lot on my supplies site with various suffix's.  Cara-pils, Cara-amber.  Is this a trade mark of a particular maltster?  What does it bring?
Caramel Malt - I thought this was another name for Crystal but am I wrong?  Probably.

Just exploring my options.
Thanks
Graham

Offline idbrew

  • 1st Kit
  • *
  • Posts: 6
    • View Profile
Re: Crystal vs Cara vs Caramel Malts
« Reply #1 on: February 16, 2011, 10:47:33 AM »
These all mean basically the same thing - that the malt's kernel has been at least partly converted to sugar during malting and then roasted to get different levels of caramelization

The malts themselves can be pretty different depending on how exactly they're made -  though all will usually add some body, color and caramel flavor

Offline hokerer

  • I spend way too much time on the AHA forum
  • ********
  • Posts: 2634
  • Manassas, VA
    • View Profile
Re: Crystal vs Cara vs Caramel Malts
« Reply #2 on: February 16, 2011, 11:04:59 AM »
Yep, Crystal, Cara, and Caramel are all synonyms.
Joe

Offline theDarkSide

  • Brewmaster General
  • *******
  • Posts: 2074
  • Derry, NH
    • View Profile
Sergeant - BNArmy Member
AHA Member
Seacoast Homebrew Club Member
https://www.facebook.com/SeacoastHomebrewClub
Stephen M.
------------------------------------------------

Offline alikocho

  • Brewmaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 567
  • Bristol, UK
    • View Profile
    • A Storm Brewing
Re: Crystal vs Cara vs Caramel Malts
« Reply #4 on: February 16, 2011, 11:45:46 AM »
Yep, Crystal, Cara, and Caramel are all synonyms.

That was what I always assumed, but I'm not sure that's the case in the UK and Europe. Crystal Malt is what we call Caramel Malt over here, but Caramalt does seem to be something subtly different.
Bristol Brewing Circle (BBC)
Bristol Craft Brewers

UK National Homebrew Competition - http://www.bristolhomebrewcompetition.org.uk/

jaybeerman

  • Guest
Re: Crystal vs Cara vs Caramel Malts
« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2011, 12:41:31 PM »
They're synonymous in that the stewing process is used to make them all.  For people new to beer-making it should be noted that, a whole buttload of different flavors can be had from the different types.  cheers, j

Online gmac

  • Brewmaster General
  • *******
  • Posts: 2024
  • London, Ontario
    • View Profile
Re: Crystal vs Cara vs Caramel Malts
« Reply #6 on: February 16, 2011, 02:28:17 PM »
, a whole buttload of different flavors can be had from the different types.

Thanks for not getting too technical on me :)

OK, i'll just go with crystal 40.  Appreciate the clarification.

jaybeerman

  • Guest
Re: Crystal vs Cara vs Caramel Malts
« Reply #7 on: February 16, 2011, 04:22:05 PM »
Thanks for not getting too technical on me :)

OK, i'll just go with crystal 40.  Appreciate the clarification.

No prob  :)  Read up on the grain descriptions on the major brew supply sites.  Or experiment on your own; after you make the brew with c40 then make the same recipe with Carastan which would be close to 40 degrees lovibond (32-40) depending on the maltster.  You may find that it has more toffee character than the standard c40.  Same thing with c60 and CaraMunich, you may find that the CaraMunich provides a fruitier, more complex, character than the c60 (there are now multiple lovibond versions of CaraMunich, each with different character).  Special B is another crystal type that claims to have a different character than the other similar lovibond crystal malts.
Just in case you didn't know this already, Carapils or any crystal type malt that has a lovibond around 10 will provide dextrins and no noticeable flavor.  Cheers, j

Offline abraxas

  • Assistant Brewer
  • ***
  • Posts: 191
    • View Profile
Re: Crystal vs Cara vs Caramel Malts
« Reply #8 on: February 16, 2011, 04:31:56 PM »
One thing I have never fully understood is how the dextrins are locked-in for Crystal malts to seemingly be immune to mashing with regard to adding body to a beer (similarly sweetness).  Are the dextrins modified in such a way that beta amalyse doesn't effect them during the mash?  

Or to put it another way, are Maillard reaction products of maltose/maltodextrin similar to the parent in some qualities (sweetness and body) but different enough to be unusable by the yeast/ amalyse enzymes?

Offline idbrew

  • 1st Kit
  • *
  • Posts: 6
    • View Profile
Re: Crystal vs Cara vs Caramel Malts
« Reply #9 on: February 16, 2011, 06:14:25 PM »
One thing I have never fully understood is how the dextrins are locked-in for Crystal malts to seemingly be immune to mashing with regard to adding body to a beer (similarly sweetness).  Are the dextrins modified in such a way that beta amalyse doesn't effect them during the mash?  

Or to put it another way, are Maillard reaction products of maltose/maltodextrin similar to the parent in some qualities (sweetness and body) but different enough to be unusable by the yeast/ amalyse enzymes?
I remember reading something about the first part somewhere (something Kai posted maybe?) - I think it was that beta amylase has trouble with mid-sized dextrins - so they tend to stick around through the mash (I hope I'm not making this up here)

Offline jibblett

  • 1st Kit
  • *
  • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
Re: Crystal vs Cara vs Caramel Malts
« Reply #10 on: February 16, 2011, 07:00:13 PM »
what a great forum!

Offline a10t2

  • Official Poobah of No Life.
  • *
  • Posts: 3163
  • Ask me why I don't like Chico!
    • View Profile
    • SeanTerrill.com
Re: Crystal vs Cara vs Caramel Malts
« Reply #11 on: February 16, 2011, 08:39:18 PM »
One thing I have never fully understood is how the dextrins are locked-in for Crystal malts to seemingly be immune to mashing with regard to adding body to a beer (similarly sweetness).

Is that actually generally accepted to be true? Intuitively, it doesn't make sense to me.
Beer is like porn. You can buy it, but it's more fun to make your own.
http://seanterrill.com/category/brewing/