Author Topic: Kinetics of Conversion With A Thin No-Sparge Mash  (Read 1535 times)

Offline tomsawyer

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1694
    • View Profile
Kinetics of Conversion With A Thin No-Sparge Mash
« on: March 27, 2011, 12:57:09 PM »
I mashed 6lb of malt with 4.125gal of water, 2.75qt/lb ratio.  The initial mash temp was 152F and it dropped to 148F during the course of the mash.  Each time I would take a small sample for refractometer testing, then stir the mash.  I tested the sugar content every fifteen minutes for two hours and got the following data:
Min      degrees Plato
15           6.5
30           9.0
45           9.8
60          10.4
75          10.8
90          11.0
105        11.3
120        11.3

I mashed out with 1/2gal of boiling water, although this only brought the temp up to 155F.  I got no additional sugars from the mashout addition.

I calculate that I got roughly 86% conversion by 105 minutes, and a preboil efficiency of 74%.
Lennie
Hannibal, MO

Offline a10t2

  • Official Poobah of No Life.
  • *
  • Posts: 3833
  • Ask me why I don't like Chico!
    • View Profile
    • SeanTerrill.com
Re: Kinetics of Conversion With A Thin No-Sparge Mash
« Reply #1 on: March 27, 2011, 01:48:12 PM »
Good stuff. Thanks for taking the time to do it.

What was the grist? I don't know that I've ever mashed quite that thin, but I'm used to seeing conversion at ~100% after 60 minutes. I'd wager the low temperature had an effect too though.
Sent from my Microsoft Bob

Beer is like porn. You can buy it, but it's more fun to make your own.
seanterrill.com/category/brewing | twomilebrewing.com

Offline tom

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1110
  • Denver, CO
    • View Profile
Re: Kinetics of Conversion With A Thin No-Sparge Mash
« Reply #2 on: March 27, 2011, 01:50:28 PM »
Thanks Lennie,

What gravity did you get?
Brew on

Offline tomsawyer

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1694
    • View Profile
Re: Kinetics of Conversion With A Thin No-Sparge Mash
« Reply #3 on: March 27, 2011, 02:42:58 PM »
The grist was 5.0lb of Rahr 2-row, 0.5lb of crystal 40 and 0.5lb of a blend of specialty malts I'd put together for another beer but didn't use.  The beer is an APA, with Chinoook for bittering and a blend of Amarillo, Cascade, Columbus and Sincoe for the late additions.

Preboil gravity was 1.040 (roughly 4gal), postboil I got 3.0gal of 1.052 OG.  Didn't lose much volume to the pellet hops because I ran it through a wire mesh screen.

I assume my crush was responsible for a less than 100% conversion.  The efficiency was affected by the fact that I added 4.625gal total, and with 0.125gal/lb left in the grain I should have had nearly 84% efficiency with 100% conversion.
Lennie
Hannibal, MO

Offline oscarvan

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1707
    • View Profile
Re: Kinetics of Conversion With A Thin No-Sparge Mash
« Reply #4 on: March 29, 2011, 06:52:41 PM »
Quote
0.5lb of a blend of specialty malts I'd put together for another beer but didn't use

I've done that.... I'm always worried that it will be the best beer ever and I won't be able to figure out what was in there.... ;D
Wooden Shoe Brew Works (not a commercial operation) Bethlehem, PA
http://www.woodenshoemusic.com/WSBW/WSBW_All_grain_Setup.html
I brew WITH style..... not necessarily TO style.....

Offline dcrawlins

  • 1st Kit
  • *
  • Posts: 12
    • View Profile
Re: Kinetics of Conversion With A Thin No-Sparge Mash
« Reply #5 on: March 30, 2011, 09:20:06 AM »
Sounds like an Australian brew in a bag method.  It is a no sparge method that works well.  I have used it for big brews to save time.

Offline andyi

  • Assistant Brewer
  • ***
  • Posts: 138
    • View Profile
Re: Kinetics of Conversion With A Thin No-Sparge Mash
« Reply #6 on: March 30, 2011, 09:30:54 AM »

Thanks for  the information.

How is the body/mouthfeel of the finished beer with that thin a mash.

Offline tomsawyer

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1694
    • View Profile
Re: Kinetics of Conversion With A Thin No-Sparge Mash
« Reply #7 on: March 31, 2011, 05:08:16 AM »
I'll let you know when I get one that far, but I'm guessing it'll be no different since I can still target my OG/FG using length of mash and mash temp.

Yes this is equivalent to BIAB with no sparge, I've seen BIAB done with a rinse but I don't know if its common.  My bag is just a MLT with braid.

I also don't know that BIAB necessarily has you use an unconventional mash ratio like the 2.75qt/lb I'm using.  This is why I'm reporting this info, simply to expand what we think of as an acceptable mash ratio.  Given enough time, it allows one to do a one step mash and lauter that I'm hoping will have no down sides.

As for the length of time it takes for conversion, I understand that this is just one data point and that the kinetics depends on crush, water chemistry and temp, among other factors.  I just threw it out as a little more in-depth version of my first observations where I mashed for 2hr just to be safe.
« Last Edit: March 31, 2011, 06:23:57 AM by tomsawyer »
Lennie
Hannibal, MO

ccarlson

  • Guest
Re: Kinetics of Conversion With A Thin No-Sparge Mash
« Reply #8 on: April 01, 2011, 07:33:05 AM »
I always mash longer than 1 hour. One hour is not long enough, IMO.

Offline a10t2

  • Official Poobah of No Life.
  • *
  • Posts: 3833
  • Ask me why I don't like Chico!
    • View Profile
    • SeanTerrill.com
Re: Kinetics of Conversion With A Thin No-Sparge Mash
« Reply #9 on: April 01, 2011, 07:42:39 AM »
I always mash longer than 1 hour. One hour is not long enough, IMO.

Long enough for what?
Sent from my Microsoft Bob

Beer is like porn. You can buy it, but it's more fun to make your own.
seanterrill.com/category/brewing | twomilebrewing.com

ccarlson

  • Guest
Re: Kinetics of Conversion With A Thin No-Sparge Mash
« Reply #10 on: April 01, 2011, 07:48:02 AM »
Complete conversion.

Offline tomsawyer

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1694
    • View Profile
Re: Kinetics of Conversion With A Thin No-Sparge Mash
« Reply #11 on: April 01, 2011, 08:47:13 AM »
I suppose that depends on how important it is to you to get every last bit of starch converted.  for a lot of people I think something over 80% is enough.  As evidence for this is the common 75% efficiency number cited by many brewers, that no doubt comes in part from a lack of 100% conversion of starches.  If you consider the theoretical recovery of a mash and a sparge, you would be getting over 90% all the time.
Lennie
Hannibal, MO

Offline a10t2

  • Official Poobah of No Life.
  • *
  • Posts: 3833
  • Ask me why I don't like Chico!
    • View Profile
    • SeanTerrill.com
Re: Kinetics of Conversion With A Thin No-Sparge Mash
« Reply #12 on: April 01, 2011, 09:06:14 AM »
If you aren't getting full conversion in an hour I think your mash chemistry may be a little out of whack. As long as I get my pH in range I have >90% conversion when I start recirculating at 45 min.
Sent from my Microsoft Bob

Beer is like porn. You can buy it, but it's more fun to make your own.
seanterrill.com/category/brewing | twomilebrewing.com

ccarlson

  • Guest
Re: Kinetics of Conversion With A Thin No-Sparge Mash
« Reply #13 on: April 01, 2011, 09:22:35 AM »
I don't have the means to test PH level, but by going with a longer mash I consistently get efficiencies in the upper 80's to lower 90's.

Offline tomsawyer

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1694
    • View Profile
Re: Kinetics of Conversion With A Thin No-Sparge Mash
« Reply #14 on: April 01, 2011, 10:57:00 AM »
I don't agree that sub-90% conversion indicates a problem with pH.  I am treating my water all the time now and checking with a pH meter, and still getting average efficiencies that are partly due to a less than complete conversion.
Lennie
Hannibal, MO