Author Topic: fg 1.022  (Read 514 times)

Offline Pope of Dope

  • Assistant Brewer
  • ***
  • Posts: 105
  • Gozer is a Hoser
    • View Profile
fg 1.022
« on: January 09, 2018, 10:10:30 PM »
Brewed a British IPA and I think I had a stuck ferment due to overly cold ferment temps around 55f. OG was 1.061 and FG is 1.022.  Tried to repitch some Nottingham which has worked occationally in the past, but didn't this time. ABV at 5.12.  Just wanting to share and see if anyone would think this beer undrinkable.  Is there any benefit to the higher FG, more sugar (other than lower alcohol of course)?  Thanks.

I like that. Hmm Hmm. "I don't know," that's nice. 'Mr. Hand, will I pass this class?' 'Gee Mr. Spicoli, I don't know.' That's nice, I really like that. You know what I'm gonna do? I'm going to leave your words on my board for all my classes to enjoy, giving you full credit of course, Mr. Spicoli.

Offline denny

  • Administrator
  • Retired with too much time on my hands
  • *****
  • Posts: 19637
  • Noti OR [1991.4, 287.6deg] AR
    • View Profile
    • Dennybrew
Re: fg 1.022
« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2018, 10:56:24 PM »
Brewed a British IPA and I think I had a stuck ferment due to overly cold ferment temps around 55f. OG was 1.061 and FG is 1.022.  Tried to repitch some Nottingham which has worked occationally in the past, but didn't this time. ABV at 5.12.  Just wanting to share and see if anyone would think this beer undrinkable.  Is there any benefit to the higher FG, more sugar (other than lower alcohol of course)?  Thanks.

Only you can tell if it's drinkable.  What was the recipe?
Life begins at 60.....1.060, that is!

www.dennybrew.com

The best, sharpest, funniest, weirdest and most knowledgable minds in home brewing contribute on the AHA forum. - Alewyfe

"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell

Offline Pope of Dope

  • Assistant Brewer
  • ***
  • Posts: 105
  • Gozer is a Hoser
    • View Profile
Re: fg 1.022
« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2018, 11:12:51 PM »
12lb  marris
1lb    German munich
.25    crystal 40
.25    crystal 55
.25    biscuit

1oz   magnum (60)
1oz   EKG (20)
.5oz  EKG (15)
1oz   fuggle (0)
1oz   fuggle (dry)

Safale 04, then repitched Nottingham at 3 weeks after gravity reading. 1 month in primary, going for 3-4 days cold crash.
og 1.061, fg 1.022, 5.12%abv

Would there be any benefit to lager it?  What if I add Brett (never done a sour before and know nothing of that process) I know the 1.022 is going to be a bit too sweet, just trying to figure out a remedy. 
« Last Edit: January 09, 2018, 11:46:28 PM by Pope of Dope »
I like that. Hmm Hmm. "I don't know," that's nice. 'Mr. Hand, will I pass this class?' 'Gee Mr. Spicoli, I don't know.' That's nice, I really like that. You know what I'm gonna do? I'm going to leave your words on my board for all my classes to enjoy, giving you full credit of course, Mr. Spicoli.

Offline dmtaylor

  • Official Poobah of No Life.
  • *
  • Posts: 3345
  • Two Rivers, WI
    • View Profile
    • Manty Malters - Meet the Malters! - Dave Taylor
Re: fg 1.022
« Reply #3 on: January 09, 2018, 11:59:50 PM »
Notty should fix it (about 77% attenuation), or especially US-05 (about 80%)... BUT.... you can't just pitch a pack straight in and expect it to perform well.  This is a case where only actively fermenting yeast will help the beer.  So, you can make a good sized yeast starter with one of those two yeasts, or any other highly attenuative yeast of your choice, let the starter ferment for a couple of days, then add that yeast starter in, keep the beer warmer, closer to 65-70 F, and hope for the best.  It should work.

Did you add that pack of Notty without making a starter or raising the temp?  Yup...
Dave

The world will become a much more pleasant place to live when each and every one of us realizes that we are all idiots.

Offline Robert

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1905
    • View Profile
Re: fg 1.022
« Reply #4 on: January 10, 2018, 12:01:13 AM »
There might be nothing wrong.  What was your mash temperature?  If it was on the high side, with 1lb crystal and a highly flocculent yeast (or two) 64% apparent attenuation is right in the ballpark for an English ale.  If not for an IPA admittedly.  Think of it as a really hoppy ESB and adjust mash and yeast next time if you want a drier beer.
Rob Stein
Akron, Ohio

I'd rather have questions I can't answer than answers I can't question.

Offline Pope of Dope

  • Assistant Brewer
  • ***
  • Posts: 105
  • Gozer is a Hoser
    • View Profile
Re: fg 1.022
« Reply #5 on: January 10, 2018, 12:15:05 AM »
Yes Dmtaylor, I just dumped in the dry yeast, I knew not to, but I did it anyways (I did warm it up though). Now that it's in a 2ndary, would you create another starter and repitch?

The mash temp was 152 Robert.  Haven't tasted it yet, but I think it's just going to be too sweet. 
I like that. Hmm Hmm. "I don't know," that's nice. 'Mr. Hand, will I pass this class?' 'Gee Mr. Spicoli, I don't know.' That's nice, I really like that. You know what I'm gonna do? I'm going to leave your words on my board for all my classes to enjoy, giving you full credit of course, Mr. Spicoli.

Online BrewBama

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1621
    • View Profile
fg 1.022
« Reply #6 on: January 10, 2018, 12:16:39 AM »
I plan on S-04, ESB, Windsor, etc English strains to stop at 20-22 depending on OG. Those strains just don’t process maltotriose (10-15% of all malt wort). “The ability to ferment maltotriose gives each strain its characteristic attenuation range.”  — BYO

https://byo.com/article/fermentation-time-line/


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
« Last Edit: January 10, 2018, 12:40:47 AM by BrewBama »
Huntsville AL

Offline Pope of Dope

  • Assistant Brewer
  • ***
  • Posts: 105
  • Gozer is a Hoser
    • View Profile
Re: fg 1.022
« Reply #7 on: January 10, 2018, 12:28:17 AM »
Thanks Brewbama.  I guess I will have to just try it out.  And, I really didn't think that the ferment was too cold, there was just a couple days in there where I had problems/lower temp than I had planned on.  So in the future maybe avoid the 04 and use the good ol' 05 or start out with a lower og for this yeast strain? 

I've never used the 04 before, and for that matter never brewed an english style before that was not a porter or stout.  I've also never had an fg this high unless adding adjunct unfermentable sugars.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2018, 12:31:19 AM by Pope of Dope »
I like that. Hmm Hmm. "I don't know," that's nice. 'Mr. Hand, will I pass this class?' 'Gee Mr. Spicoli, I don't know.' That's nice, I really like that. You know what I'm gonna do? I'm going to leave your words on my board for all my classes to enjoy, giving you full credit of course, Mr. Spicoli.

Offline Robert

  • Senior Brewmaster
  • ******
  • Posts: 1905
    • View Profile
Re: fg 1.022
« Reply #8 on: January 10, 2018, 12:34:34 AM »
Mash a little lower and a little longer, try a different yeast; I don't think you had too low a fermentation temp either.  I still think you got what you can expect with that mash and yeast. FWIW, I'd probably drink that beer as is.  Nothing wrong with a malty ale.
Rob Stein
Akron, Ohio

I'd rather have questions I can't answer than answers I can't question.

Offline mabrungard

  • Brewmaster General
  • *******
  • Posts: 2437
  • Water matters!
    • View Profile
    • Bru'n Water
Re: fg 1.022
« Reply #9 on: January 10, 2018, 01:18:13 AM »
I used Windsor in a brown ale that started at 1.060 and ended at 1.022. It was nice and hoppy and it really wasn't overly sweet or unpleasant.

While Windsor yeast is intended for smaller beers made with some simple sugars or mashed to attenuate, it can make decent beers.

Don't assume that your beer is lost. Get it carbed up and make a better assessment then.
Martin B
Carmel, IN

BJCP National
Foam Blowers of Indiana (FBI)

Brewing Water Information at:
https://sites.google.com/site/brunwater/

Like Bru'n Water on Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/Brun-Water-464551136933908/?ref=bookmarks

Offline klickitat jim

  • I must live here
  • **********
  • Posts: 8570
    • View Profile
Re: fg 1.022
« Reply #10 on: January 10, 2018, 01:35:23 AM »
Remember that unfermentable sugars aren't necessarily as sweet to us as fermentable sugars. I just took a gravity sample of two beers, been fermenting 9 days on wy1028. OGs were 1.062 and 1.069. The 1.062 Bitter is at 1.014 and the 1.069 stout is at 1.020. The bitter is sweeter than the stout right now. But not by much. And it's obvious by looking at them that they are not quite done

Offline skyler

  • Brewmaster
  • *****
  • Posts: 824
  • Hmm. Human music. I like it.
    • View Profile
    • Brewing After Law School
Re: fg 1.022
« Reply #11 on: January 11, 2018, 10:12:45 PM »
I don’t think temperature was the issue, as S-04 is a cold-loving ale yeast. Just keg/bottle it and call it a “strong bitter.”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk