I recently ordered 24 1L flip-top bottles that claim to be designed for beer. I have seen such things used at a few breweries and I really like the idea of being able to pour two 500mL pints or three ~330 mL glasses of beer from a bottle (22 oz bombers are a frustrating size, IMO), as well as being able to have them double as smallish growlers. Although I haven't bottled in several years, I understand the process of using a solution of priming sugar and a bottling bucket.
However, it dawns on me that my sparkling new fermenter can bottle directly if I use its spigot with a spring-loaded bottle filler and "carbonation drops" instead of a priming solution. The issue is how many drops to use. Each drop supposedly gives the right amount of sugar for a slightly overcarbonated 12 oz bottle of pale ale. I think it's ~2.5 volumes of CO2 per 12 oz per drop. 1L is about 34 oz, so 2 drops would give me ~1.76 volumes of CO2 (maybe ok for a bitter), 3 drops would give me ~2.65 volumes of CO2 (probably good for a hefeweizen) and 4 drops would give me ~3.53 volumes of CO2.
It has been so long since I have bottled a Belgian-style ale, but I know they are typically carbonated more than American ales. I have seen appropriate CO2 levels listed as high as 4 volumes of CO2, but I wanted confirmation that ~3.53 volumes of CO2 wouldn't be better than ~2.65 volumes for a strong Belgian ale. The recipe in question is not to-style, but will be dark, roastier than any genuine trappist beer and approximately 10% ABV. Is ~3.53 better than ~2.65 volumes of CO2? What is everyone's opinion?