Mill gap is worth some research. The efficiency difference between a wide vs tight gap is a $1-$2 cost to a homebrew batch so that’s not a show stopper. But there are other considerations outside cost. You can use a feeler gauge, I use a No 14 sieve.
This is how I found my gap:
I did this by setting the mill at a certain gap, milling 100 grams of standard pale malt, placed the milled grain on a No 14 sieve, shook it side to side for 15 seconds – tap, shook it back and forth for 15 seconds – tap, and repeated this for 3 minutes. I weighed how much was left on top of the sieve and how much was sifted into the paper plate beneath it. Then I brewed a batch.
I ended up with a balance sweet spot between good extract and good recirculation. X% remained on top of the sieve and Y% fell thru. I marked my progress on the side plate of the mill.
This is one of the things I learned that Summer I brewed the same Pale Ale substituting hops to discern their flavor much like the Single Hop Experiment beers at MoreBeer.
Now, I am beginning to think there are impacts of milling beyond efficiency or the issue of a stuck lauter. I have been brewing session beers lately and it seems the recipes I have researched would indicate the weight of grain the author suggests would yield a much higher ABV on my system. That suggests, among other things, that their mill is not set as tight as mine therefore requiring more grain to get the OG. Attenuation and as a result FG may be impacted as well.
“some contend the quest to eek out a few extra gravity points may actually decrease wort and, consequently, beer quality.” - M. Schott