Got my Rum oaked Barleywine through. Meads were not handled in the best way in Chicago, IMO. Lots of folks without mead experience judging meads. For Traditionals, it's particularly troublesome because they aren't easy to judge. Can't wait to see my scoresheets and get upset again...
Congrats on the Rum BW! Sounds delicious. It could be worse...you could still be waiting on San Diego results like me.
I'd like to see some changes to how meads and ciders are handled at NHC, either having them as a separate competition from beer or limiting mead/cider judging to 3-4 regions to condense the entries. It really isn't fair with some regions not even having 3 meads/ciders in a category and then some having 10+.
o
I hear you, but what happens if the 3 in one region are better than the top ones from the region with 10 entries...you just never know. I don't know how they can correct for that. I have had a lager beer get a 43 but not advance in a large competition because the competition is so stiff ...just saying.
Actually, Dennis's idea is a great one. I like the idea of having them sent to a region that actually has the personnel to do a good job judging them. Even if the 3 in one region are better than the top ones in another region, it doesn't matter that much. We're just trying to get to the top 3 at the second round, right? So long as the 3 best make it there, then it's all good. The bigger issue is when there are 2 in a region and they both advance. It makes the person that placed 4th or 5th at a bigger region feel screwed. At any rate, I'd like to see highly qualified lead judges in each pair, particularly for outlier categories like meads and ciders. The biggest issue is that the best qualified folks in a lot of regions also happen to have entries, thus disqualifying themselves. This wouldn't be an issue if they entered in a non-local regional, but that's the gamble I guess. Consolidating the meads and ciders would add some layer of validity to the first round, I think.