Mr Bamforths comments were quite simpler than yours on the subject of meta in the mash- “Sulfites in the mash are to be avoided, yeast will reduce it to sulfide and you will end up with an egg-y aroma in your beer.”
Do you feel he is incorrect about this?
Yes, I feel he is incorrect about this, if that is his actual direct quote (although, a little context can go a long way). The statement is too simplistic, and I feel it's been taken out of context.
If sulfites in the mash directly lead to hydrogren sulfide in the beer then anyone/everyone who uses campden for chlorine/-amine removal would experience this, and there are A LOT of people using campden for chlorine/-amines removal in their strike water moments before mashing in.
Yeah, but only in fairy-dust sprinkle amounts -- 1/4 tablet per 5 gallons is friggin NUTHIN', and probably boils off to a great extent during the boil. In greater amounts, I dunno.
Okay, but those details don't factor into Dr. Bamforth's quote - his quote is all or nothing according to baybrewer (but it might just be my dilusion talking..... or ego... I don't know, it's hard to tell them apart at times
).
What I gather then is that "fairy dust" amounts are exempt from the rule, and anything more than can be confidently contained in TinkerBell's satchel will lead to rotten egg beer. It does not appear that there is a gray area here.
However, leaving fairy tale land and coming back to reality (which is realllllly hard for me to do), Dr. Bamforth actually recommends the use of metabisulfite (or sulfur dioxide) as a method of increasing shelf stability and reducing staling flavors:
(if you or anyone is willing to listen and watch Dr. Bamforth for 1 minute, you'll see his words from his mouth)
https://youtu.be/Fm2t_5HrMcc?t=1058